Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: 2D or 3D

2015-11-16 16:14:36
adaca to All
How many are old school
2015-11-16 16:16:10
o/
2015-11-16 16:20:24
2D of course ;p

Should be also option "Dont watch" :P
2015-11-16 16:27:53
2d i tink it is easier to see tactical results of the tactic that way.
I like 3d, it's nice/fun to watch. But still prefer 2d because of the analyzing.
2015-11-16 16:30:25
2D! The best for watch the matches and analyzing the tactics!
2015-11-16 16:35:30
Both of them )
2015-11-16 17:05:40
As rarely I watch matches in Sokker nowadays, I do it in 2D.
2015-11-16 17:06:17
2D because it is simple and you can clearly see how the players move. There's more game in 2D than in 3D and is great fun
2015-11-16 17:20:32
2D...3D is weird to watch and the ball can't be seen very clearly
2015-11-16 17:28:23
2D for sure ;)
2015-11-16 18:08:30
2D...3D is weird to watch and the ball can't be seen very clearly +1

2D too
2015-11-16 18:11:09
I'd say 3D engine was the main users leaving trigger. Not because it was a bad feature, which it wasn't, but because all the important issues were neglected at the time.
2015-11-16 18:58:16
Users always leave, it is the intake that stopped......
2015-11-16 19:01:26
only 3D
2015-11-16 19:04:51
Only 2D for me... I love my playmobils ! :-)
2015-11-16 21:33:05
3D? What the hell are you speaking about?


:P