Subject: GTA IV

? Which bridge?

indeed Rubinho, good point sir. Also Tommy Vercetti was an interesting character, likable italian american and funny at times, and with Carl Johnson, he could become fat which was amazing, and a likable character, but Niko is a boring steriotypical boring bolkan Thug with no personality, i just felt like giving up playing through this game because i kept blowing Niko up.

I liked him. The only thing I didn't like about GTA IV was Rockstar was clearly trying to save money on the soundtrack. It wasn't up to the standard of previous games.

Oh and the San Andreas island design was terrible. I loved the territory grabbing but once you started crossing the bridges it became too far to drive. San Andreas is the only game in the series that I haven't completed.
(edited)

It seems like any bridge to me.

I gave up this time with GTA, I kinda set the tone with my first 'Save Roman, he's so helpless' mission by running in and unknowingly beating up Roman, which became a trend as I tried to kill him off somehow.

"Hey cousin, lets go bowling"

I'll always prefer San Andreas, but the graphics are much better on GTA IV.

Why else do you think Rockstar are putting GTA V in Los Santos again? :)
(edited)

In my opinion? Because only in Los Santos (in GTA IV) you could get to the top of a skycraper and jump off it while riding a BMX, doing flips and barrels and crash in the middle of the city in the end ;]

That was so cool, time-killing and ridicoulous :D

I loved jumping off of the top of Mount Chiliad in a VW Camper! :D

:-)

Yeah, doing crazy things is the best in GTA :D Now, since I haven' t played it for many years, I remember myself boring unmercifully at school on chemistry class, thinking about how many hovercrafts will I blow up at once (the so called nuclear bomb :D) on a top of a scycraper when I' ll get home :D Totally surrealistic

---

---

Piracy is not permitted on the forums.

oh..sorry