Subject: EURO 2012 - Poland & Ukraine

I did and I don't know what you mean. Which big teams were damaged there on behalf of which small teams? Decisions I know of there were only controversial and they were critisized that much only because big teams are used not to have controversial decisions ruled against them but for them.

Which big teams were damaged there on behalf of which small teams?
U crazy?
Spain & Italy maybe? Or are they to small for u?

I am against video proof. There are quite a few bad sides to that:

1. Possibility to change a correct decision due to lack of time for analysis.
2. Possibility to abuse hawk-eye calls - can be also tacticlly used instead of time-out
3. Stimulate refs to call offsides more because wrong offside cannot be corrected after checking video while wrong goal can.

No use to discuss if you're not gonna take your time to answer my questions the way I asked them and instead take your time to post such scorning memes. That is definately not the level of conversation I engage in.

:*

Interesting how they have something in common: Spain, Germany and France vs. Croatia, Denmark and Ireland. I can't remember these big teams getting out of big competitions on referee mistakes.

Very interesting fact.

stop arguing, your not on Ssha`s level of deep thinking:P

stop arguing, your not on Ssha`s level of deep thinking:P

Everyone has the right to argue!

You know my level ?!?

I didn't know ^^

it definitly wasn`t penalty at Mandzukic in the first half, the croatian striker accidentally kicked the opponent`s boot..and i have my doubts regarding the second one
though croatia had some pretty big chances but overall, spain deserved the victory

have you watched the statistics?

croatia- spain

shots: 5(3) 16(10)
possesion 36 64
passes 234 550
(edited)

Seriously?! Are you blind?! Check under the picture what he wrote!


Italy and Spain were out of that WC, due to referee mistakes!

it was penalty for sure ;)

no way...the romanian commentators say it was but it clearly wasn`t
the spanish tackled the ball, madzukic kicked his boot and got injured..as simple as that

except the goal,they actually didn't have any bigger opportunity,mostly shots from outside of the 16m area or shots from dead corner

and i have my doubts regarding the second one

then it's you against the world

it definitly wasn`t penalty at Mandzukic in the first half, the croatian striker accidentally kicked the opponent`s boot

Ramos' boot was too high and he kicked Mandžukić with sole,despite he touched the ball it was dangerous play...but I'm not sure anymore if you're arguing or just trolling

no way...the romanian commentators say it was but it clearly wasn`t
the spanish tackled the ball, madzukic kicked his boot and got injured..as simple as that

tackle the ball and got injured ?!?
Why injured, if only tackled the ball ?

no comment...

the romanian commentators say

who? the blind ones?

ramos tackled the ball and madzukic tried to shot to goal and accidentaly kick the spanish boot...if ramos hadn`t touched the ball, it would had been a penalty...