Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Would you kill one to save many? Moral dilemma
You are not God to decide who lives and who dies.At that moment when u take the decision could be no other posibility to survive but who knows what will appear next day?
the problem is not that u answered like that, is cause u still think u took the right decision after others gave u good reasons to not do it.
Lol, who is deciding what?
Question was asked if i could decide then what would be my decision.
And i expressed it. And i stand for my word!
You really would not want me as a ruler :-).
First thing i would do is to forbid alcohol.
Then smoking.
Then reenabling the sentence of death.
And then three times convicted => sentence of death.
Thats because i believe that humanity needs strong hand to take over it.
Believe or not if i would not be killed in first week, then humanity would be happy as never was ;-).
And who are you? God? When you want to forbid me to express my opinion? :-).
the problem is not that u answered like that, is cause u still think u took the right decision after others gave u good reasons to not do it.
Lol, who is deciding what?
Question was asked if i could decide then what would be my decision.
And i expressed it. And i stand for my word!
You really would not want me as a ruler :-).
First thing i would do is to forbid alcohol.
Then smoking.
Then reenabling the sentence of death.
And then three times convicted => sentence of death.
Thats because i believe that humanity needs strong hand to take over it.
Believe or not if i would not be killed in first week, then humanity would be happy as never was ;-).
And who are you? God? When you want to forbid me to express my opinion? :-).
I will ignore all statements which lack arguments.
Yes. I show you your inconsistency (world is better off without humans vs. we must save humankind), so I must lack arguments.
1. right to live - NO - in USA (democracy) you still can be killed by law, which i think is good.
So because in the USA, death penalty is still legal (in some states), that proves your point? I have news for you: it doesn't.
2. right to property - NO - Everyone had ALL, "every" property belonged to all
Everyone has everything and they all lived happily ever after. Bam. Reality knocks on the door. There is no private property in a communist totalitarian state.
Yes. I show you your inconsistency (world is better off without humans vs. we must save humankind), so I must lack arguments.
1. right to live - NO - in USA (democracy) you still can be killed by law, which i think is good.
So because in the USA, death penalty is still legal (in some states), that proves your point? I have news for you: it doesn't.
2. right to property - NO - Everyone had ALL, "every" property belonged to all
Everyone has everything and they all lived happily ever after. Bam. Reality knocks on the door. There is no private property in a communist totalitarian state.
Lol, who is deciding what?
Question was asked if i could decide then what would be my decision.
You still have the choice NOT to make that decision.
You really would not want me as a ruler :-).
I agree on that one :-)
First thing i would do is to forbid alcohol.
Oh yes, that glorious era in the American history in which alcohol was banned. Rising criminality, how wonderful.
Then smoking.
Smoking is bad, mkay. You should not smoke.
Then reenabling the sentence of death.
Because killing people who killed people is the solution.
Thats because i believe that humanity needs strong hand to take over it.
You should read some books on history. See who said similar things. See how they and their society ended.
And who are you? God? When you want to forbid me to express my opinion? :-).
Nobody is a god. I just want to show you how retarded that opinion really is.
Question was asked if i could decide then what would be my decision.
You still have the choice NOT to make that decision.
You really would not want me as a ruler :-).
I agree on that one :-)
First thing i would do is to forbid alcohol.
Oh yes, that glorious era in the American history in which alcohol was banned. Rising criminality, how wonderful.
Then smoking.
Smoking is bad, mkay. You should not smoke.
Then reenabling the sentence of death.
Because killing people who killed people is the solution.
Thats because i believe that humanity needs strong hand to take over it.
You should read some books on history. See who said similar things. See how they and their society ended.
And who are you? God? When you want to forbid me to express my opinion? :-).
Nobody is a god. I just want to show you how retarded that opinion really is.
I just want to show you how retarded that opinion really is.
:-)
thats your opinion.
There is no point of discussing anything with you ;-). You are lacking inteligence, commons sense, knowledge, experience and whats the worst, you think that only your opinion is right. That proves that statement above.
I really wish you that you get to a point that you want to kill someone who deserves it.
Howgh.
:-)
thats your opinion.
There is no point of discussing anything with you ;-). You are lacking inteligence, commons sense, knowledge, experience and whats the worst, you think that only your opinion is right. That proves that statement above.
I really wish you that you get to a point that you want to kill someone who deserves it.
Howgh.
Lol, who is deciding what?
Question was asked if i could decide then what would be my decision.
YOU.:) the question it was like if u are the one that decides...not about the one that answer for a poll in that island->So ur decision makes the kids to die as being there the one in charge to take decision and not only a simple guy that answer a question.
And who are you? God? When you want to forbid me to express my opinion? :-)
when i did that? :) as long u are still an IT guy and not a leader with power about humanity, we are cool:)
(edited)
Question was asked if i could decide then what would be my decision.
YOU.:) the question it was like if u are the one that decides...not about the one that answer for a poll in that island->So ur decision makes the kids to die as being there the one in charge to take decision and not only a simple guy that answer a question.
And who are you? God? When you want to forbid me to express my opinion? :-)
when i did that? :) as long u are still an IT guy and not a leader with power about humanity, we are cool:)
(edited)
remember that those sick kids would die anyway, in some unstated time. we anyway can assume it as few months away from now-on....
remember that those sick kids would die anyway, in some unstated time. we anyway can assume it as few months away from now-on....
The point is that a solution (medication) can be found so that kids CAN be saved, even the ones that are ill today.
The point is that a solution (medication) can be found so that kids CAN be saved, even the ones that are ill today.
yes, it might be foung, noone knows when - maybe day after you used the fumes?
If there's a chance, that the medicine could be found, then we can't say that the sick kids would die anyway.
Indeed. But it's just a matter of moral principles. I cannot justify to allow those fumes.
please share the link if possible guys.