Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: training

  • 1
  • 2
2010-01-26 13:25:47
i know a player plays worse when he is slightly injured, but what about training. how much training will he get if he's slightly injured? couldn't find anything in the rules, anyone got any ideas?
2010-01-26 13:29:34
He will get full training for the minutes played as normal as long as he remains slightly injured before thursday (i.e. he must be slightly injured on wednesday to get training the following morning).
2010-01-26 13:33:00
yeah but what if he's still slightly injured on thursday? will he only get 50% of what he normally would? is it worth playing him?
2010-01-26 13:42:03
As long as it doesn't say 7 days or more on wednesday then he'll get the training on thursday. Training is before any updates, so there the simple answer to that question is yes, except when a player has 7-8 days remaining on wednesday ;-)
2010-01-26 13:42:05
no. he will get training. the only 2 problems of playing slighty injured chaps is that they play worse than normal and the risk of further and worse injury is increased over a perfectly fit chap.
2010-01-26 13:45:56
ah thanks :) it's only a friendly, so not bothered how he plays, and i'll take the risk :) always thought they only got part of the training lol :)
2010-01-26 22:11:05
With apologies in advance to jaize, but is what he has said about "the risk of further and worse injury is increased over a perfectly fit chap" actually correct?

I thought I read somewhere, ages ago, that wasn't the case in Sokker (as opposed to Hattrick) - Now he's got me worried that I've remembered wrongly
2010-01-26 22:13:35
It's arguable, and you can do it until the cows come home if you like, or something, but there is no real proof either way.

I have played an injured player more than a dozen times and i think i've had a re-injury once.

Missing out on training is far worse than another potential injury.

The worse bit just means the new injury is added on to the days of the old one i believe.
2010-01-26 22:16:40
I think the chances of him getting injured are slim but still a bit higher than a fully fit player?
2010-01-26 22:17:31
That's the arugable bit. I don't think it's coded, but people will say their performance is worse (which is true) which means they're slower and more susceptible to tackles...so more inclined to be injured.
2010-02-01 20:14:55
No.

It's clearly stated in the rules, injured player will only play worse than fully fit players, without any higher risk of injury.

edit: answered a bit late, but anyway...
(edited)
2010-02-01 21:29:54
I think the more susceptible to tackles thing gets nullified really. As the player will be more slow and less likely to get to the ball anyway.
2010-02-07 18:15:43
another training question...

i have a walkover tonight, if i had planned to make a sub after 60 minutes, will the training get split accordingly, or will the player that starts get the full 90 minutes of training?
2010-02-07 19:08:59
the player that starts get the full 90 mins of training
2010-02-07 19:10:45
If a player plays in a league match , and a NT match - will he get 150% training?
2010-02-07 19:32:42
well, 100% is maximum, that's why it's called 100% :)

I've never known those training percents, there are lots of discussions, I think only greg knows exactly (or maybe not even him :P)

the idea is that he'll get a nice bonus.
I had a 18yo striker who poped in 4 weeks to outstanding pace and 4 weeks to incredible pace, playing 7 games for U21.
  • 1
  • 2