Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [Change] Rating match calcul
- 1
- 2
This rating is a good indicator about twice teams force in a match.
And so a good indication about if a manager is a good trainer about tactic he use by performing with a lower rating. The rating is calculated with numerics evaluations given to each player (even he plays just 2 minutes).
But
His calcul mode is often a big mistake because it doesn't care about minutes played by each players.
So a player playing 2 minutes impact the same effect than a player playing 90 minutes, on average rating. Another problem is when a player play few minutes, his note his incredible.
Then global rating for team is false.
I propose that rating for a team in a match will be calculated prorata minutes played by each players coming on the grass. Simply.
(edited)
And so a good indication about if a manager is a good trainer about tactic he use by performing with a lower rating. The rating is calculated with numerics evaluations given to each player (even he plays just 2 minutes).
But
His calcul mode is often a big mistake because it doesn't care about minutes played by each players.
So a player playing 2 minutes impact the same effect than a player playing 90 minutes, on average rating. Another problem is when a player play few minutes, his note his incredible.
Then global rating for team is false.
I propose that rating for a team in a match will be calculated prorata minutes played by each players coming on the grass. Simply.
(edited)
+1 I tried manual calculation but in 21 century automation is important
Nobody against that as i see ...
But perhaps most of people doe'snt matter about ...
But perhaps most of people doe'snt matter about ...
Post coming from three years ago ^^
I talk some days ago about that again in another post ...
I had forgotten this one, thanks to manuelmarques for his temporal exploration :-)
(edited)
I talk some days ago about that again in another post ...
I had forgotten this one, thanks to manuelmarques for his temporal exploration :-)
(edited)
I made five substitutions with two minutes to go to emphasise this point, and look:
My team had 55.2, but if you calculated the average based on minutes played, it would be 68.3
https://sokker.org/comment?matchID=43766143
rating nº minuts rating for the total
1 Flavius Madincea GK 87 90 87,0
2 Ignace Dussaux DEF 62 88 88 60,6
S Nuninho Mantas DEF 22 -88 2 0,5
3 Radenko Bogdan DEF 63 90 63,0
4 Giovani Natzuka ATT 70 88 88 68,4
S Iuliu-Virgil Pungă ATT 33 -88 2 0,7
5 Marek Wojewoda DEF 65 90 65,0
6 Patroclo Demurtas DEF 59 88 88 57,7
S Adalsindo Landeiro DEF 30 -88 2 0,7
7 Anghel Buia MID 67 88 88 65,5
S Israel Michelato MID 25 -88 2 0,6
8 Mihail Tiutiu MID 64 90 64,0
9 Pablo Nourredine DEF 70 88 88 68,4
S Maximos Sevastis DEF 17 -88 2 0,4
10 Lech Korbiel MID 71 90 71,0
11 Hồ Mạnh Hoàng ATT 78 90 78,0
751,5
*=751,5/11=68,3
My team had 55.2, but if you calculated the average based on minutes played, it would be 68.3
https://sokker.org/comment?matchID=43766143
rating nº minuts rating for the total
1 Flavius Madincea GK 87 90 87,0
2 Ignace Dussaux DEF 62 88 88 60,6
S Nuninho Mantas DEF 22 -88 2 0,5
3 Radenko Bogdan DEF 63 90 63,0
4 Giovani Natzuka ATT 70 88 88 68,4
S Iuliu-Virgil Pungă ATT 33 -88 2 0,7
5 Marek Wojewoda DEF 65 90 65,0
6 Patroclo Demurtas DEF 59 88 88 57,7
S Adalsindo Landeiro DEF 30 -88 2 0,7
7 Anghel Buia MID 67 88 88 65,5
S Israel Michelato MID 25 -88 2 0,6
8 Mihail Tiutiu MID 64 90 64,0
9 Pablo Nourredine DEF 70 88 88 68,4
S Maximos Sevastis DEF 17 -88 2 0,4
10 Lech Korbiel MID 71 90 71,0
11 Hồ Mạnh Hoàng ATT 78 90 78,0
751,5
*=751,5/11=68,3
- 1
- 2