Subject: [idea]U-23, U-24 or U-25 National Teams

Are miss the main point or acting like you don't understand? it does not have any indication or evidence that shows — contrary to what who claimed — that it has "plenty" of users concerned by NT. In the contrary, implicitly, you admit it : "It doesn't matter as long as there is a coach.".

Thanks, NT can survive.

I'm not talking about the distribution country

And me im talking about that.

Not only sokker need more "users concerned by NT" but more "NT communities", because the first cannot happen without the second. When "small" nations loose users at a point that "community" mean nothing, everything fall into a ridiculous absurd discussion:

"Even though there's just 1 user in Luxembourg, it hasn't stopped him from coaching the team and trying his best for senior NT"

Seriously?

It's simply better that the DEVs roll out some kind of a survey asking whether people want an additional U-24 category or not. It's not like with the introduction of U-24, there'll be some huge problem in the game. Addition of U-24 will add more depth to the game is what I think.

sure.

-1

another extra chance for some injury's...

-1

I would rather prefer a small tournament, something U27 played every 2 seasons. Could be in the second half of the season after WC finals.

Another NT is too much!

-1

Small nations wont be able to compete, and also use biggest stars on seniors already from U/24

For instance Scottish second best wing is 24..... and we are a solid top 40 team