Subject: [Bug] Player with wrong quantity of NT games and experience

Hello,

I try to follow all NT games of my players, yesterday one of my players played his 4th NT game, i remember yesterday (friday) he has 3 games, however, after the actualization (on satuday) he appears with only 1 NT game and his experience is now lower than i remember, he has 40 official games and now only have unsatisfactory experience,

This player is the player that i comment:

https://sokker.org/player/PID/37579586

These are the NT game that he played:

https://sokker.org/comment?matchID=38063686
https://sokker.org/stats/matchID/38329073/teamID/402
https://sokker.org/stats/matchID/38315586/teamID/402
https://sokker.org/stats/matchID/38352936/teamID/402

Curioslly, his first NT game was against Sakartvelo (a forfeit game) and his last, before the problem, was against the same rival.

I don't know if is a mistake of my observation or if is a real bug or something rare. Please, can someone check if there are something wrong?,

Thanks in advance,
Regards,

Lol seems as major bug u can see all his games in his history .

If I remember well and I'm not mistaken, the matches for the statistics only are counted when the player plays at least half a match (that is, 45'+, -or maybe a bit less, as I don't recall exactly-).

That was introduced at some moment to avoid 'buffing' the history of players by unuscruplous NT managers, putting a lot of them to play only 15', 5' or just 1' minute in matches in order to inflate their prices, misleading potential buyers into thinking they were realiable candidates called to play many matches when in fact they were 1-minute substitutes in them.

Of the four matches you point, one was a walkover in your side (so it does not count), and in other two he played 29' only (less that 1/3 of the match, so he would not qualify either). As he only played in only one match more than half time (90' vs Skartavelo), and it shows 1 match, then the sum would add.

So, I guess it might not be a 'major bug', sorry.
.
(edited)

Walk over counts as training unless is fault of his NT manager did not checked that

I do not think 29 min do not count as a whole game for me definitely needs to check especially if decrease of numbers was detected..

It's about activity, I remember it from the past. If the player has 0% activity in the game, he doesn't get the game in the statistics of official matches/NTmatches. And this keeper has had 0% activity, i.e. he hasn't touched the ball during the 29 mins he's been in the field.

hm thats not cool is not his fault if opponent is not good :(

Maybe you are right and it is a function of the player's activity, but if this is the case, will training be affected?

If someone uses the corner kick tactic to avoid injury, several players will not touch the ball during the game, will they lose training that week because the game did not count for them?

I have been in the game for years and this must be something new, since I had not seen that matches will not count for a player if he plays for a few minutes or has no activity.

No training is based on min played

No training is based on min played

Well....technically all skills except stamina, are based on minutes played...

But there's no difference in training if a player had 50% activity or 0%, so training is not based on minutes ACTIVE play.

* I know this is what you wanted to say though * :-p
(edited)

Thanks yes

A player has to have touched the ball before it counts as played in statistics afaik.

Its a bug indeed.