Subject: National team income

I'm not asking for money, I just have a suggestion on how to distribute the funds generated from the team.

If my suggestion made the game more popular, I think the developers would be happy.

Well, read minds first and then write...
The owners want to level the playing field between the teams and minimize top players as much as possible. With that goal, revenues are being reduced—how do you imagine they will add new revenue???
There are other much more important things to fix, clearly you have no idea how programming works, and that any changes can lead to unpredictable consequences.
From what is written above, the conclusion is—pointless topic.

New here? Devs don't listen to us :)

Lol. Just lol.

@achmid: there is according to rules actually small attendance bonus (small amount more fans attending your matches) for having nt players

I cant find it now, but i know it used to be there

I know there was a proposition on the table for inserting that into the game, but I never saw a confirmation that is was actually implemented.

Found this old post in this thread on the subject:

2009-08-18 13:53:48
rtg [del] til kenyard [del]

ok this if from greg. Ive asked for the word little to be quantified and also for an esitmated date where medical care will come into play.

+ prestige - a little more fans will come on his club matches,
yes

+ better medical care of injured national player.
still not active in update

Problem is that there is no verification to that statement and the user doesn't play the game anymore... If this came straight from greg, ok, but it came from a Scottish user...
Pardon me for being sceptical + it's hardly presenting itself in evidence on our finances...

rtg was admin and did much for the community back then, its just as trustworthy as if geston says something now

geston is a dev, so slightly different, but ok, I think we can say that the feature has a 95% probability to exist and still being active for the moment.

I'm also sure that this attendance bonus was in the rules.

Maybe its too little to notice or maybe we can't notice because everyone gets it (almost all teams have at least one player with some NT matches).

If I remember right, rtg was an official back in the day, so it would be weird if he'd just made up those answers from greg.

No problem in being sceptical. But remember, people also didn't believe BMI was implemented ;o)

Logical if you have to believe hear say in stead of reading official news about it.
No problem, the ''extra'' it brings in will probably be minimal anyways...

There are two approaches.
Take anything Raul said as granted and be dissapointed (or at least wait for long period of time).
Or we can take any previous promises from greg (or his subordinates) and still wait for them.

In the end we would end in the same place - promised land ;)

I'm pretty sure that was in the rules at one stage too, but I'm not sure that it was ever actually implemented.

If it was implemented, it was so small, noone ever worked out the benefit, and it certainly didn't stack (which in real life, you'd expect it to stack, as I'd prefer to go watch a game with multiple NT players rather than just 1)