Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: Two Tactics

2008-01-08 15:00:12
Nin [del] to All
See the main page for the idea.
I like it. People have been asking for a while to be able to change tactics as a conditional order. It's good to see the devs are actually bringing in something important to change the game.
There is only 1 problem with this though and thats there is already a lack of conditional order spaces.
2008-01-08 15:27:11
It can give tough matches quite new dimmension...
(edited)
2008-01-08 15:28:25
yeah, I like this idea too :) but gk positioning.. and players in every place on the ground.. it`s big change.. maybe we`ll should learn tactics from begining
2008-01-08 18:22:04
I like these changing. It secures more opportunity to beat my opponent by tactic.
2008-01-08 19:20:26
Hi all!

I read the news.


I like the sokker very much I like to to make tactic every match, but this new develep would be bad.


I tell the truth, I am not happy. I am sad. I think I will finish the sokker, if they want this new develops.

REASONS(TWO TACTIC IS BAD):
-----------------------------------------

1. The little teams will be in disadvantage, against the better teams.

2. The sokker will be a roulette game, for example you pu the red or the black.

3. The training will be in danger.
(edited)
2008-01-08 19:23:05
1. The little teams will be in disadvantage.

I dont see why

2. The sokker will be a roulette game, for example you put the red or the black.

No moreso than it is now.

3. The training will be in danger.

We'll see about that. I doubt the devs would introduce something thats going to mess up training.
(edited)
2008-01-08 19:38:42
Well, but this would be the changes, but why we pay the "plus"?

Now the "plus" is good because I see my opponent how to make his def.line(for example).
But in the 45.minutes, when he would change, what could I do??
2008-01-08 19:41:27
1. The little teams will be in disadvantage.


They have less good players, and they have less possibilities for the changes...

It is no good...
2008-01-08 19:48:16
Thats the disadvantage of not having good players.
2008-01-08 19:53:55
Small clubs play against small clubs. Btw: I think they have broader selections than bigger clubs.
2008-01-08 20:02:32
Now the "plus" is good because I see my opponent how to make his def.line(for example).
But in the 45.minutes, when he would change, what could I do??


Well this point you make could be an advantage to the little team that you claim will suffer most. I don't agree with your reasoning.

Sounds a great change to me.
2008-01-08 20:08:30
Lot of peaople go to work, their freetime is less.

For example, when I make a tactic is not only an hour. Every little thing is important.

The opponent def. line, att line. You are thinking about how to make your lines.

Well, everybody works more on the tactic...

My opinion. A football game will be easy-handled, creative, enjoyable...

For exampe, the Pmanager is very boring I think, the players have a lot of skills you can see a more thing, when you want to buy a new player...

Creative: you can make tactic you see the match you can do some changes. Now this is the sokker.

Hattrick is not creative, because nothing tactic, you don't see the match...

Too coplicate: "Future sokker" would be two complicate. When you have a girlfriend, you must know her brain:)), but your manager mates not your girlfriends:))

Only your friends. You know something for your friends and spend them less time than with your girlfriend... It is a stupid example but my english not very good and I try to illustrate this... :))
2008-01-08 20:14:03
This is by far the best improvement of sokker since I play it (more than 2 years)

Simply OUTSTANDING!
2008-01-08 20:17:12
Ok i think i get what you mean. When i started this game the ammount of time it took to do the tactics was annoying. It doesn't bother me anymore because i'm so well practiced in it i can knockup a fairly solid formation in 15 minutes but yes, i get what you mean about tactics taking time when you dont have any.
For this though, having only 1 tactic could be an advantage or disadvantage which is why i like this idea.
2008-01-08 20:27:49
i agree with Red Pirate,when he said that more tactics would mean more time needed..and unfortunately nobody have time enough for Sokker..now the study of the tactic before a match will take a lot of time in plus!
Anyway,i'll wait to see how it will works and after i'll ask my opinions.
(edited)
2008-01-08 20:29:48
You should get this post looked at by someone more proficient in English. I have no idea of what you're trying to say.