Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: Fake Talent Warning
As it turns out, this line jump can also happen when the image is getting rescaled.
Could very much be a good screenshot but only rescaled and smoothed.
That's why I said that everyone has to make his own opinion if he trust an user/screenshot or not.
Sooner or later the buyer will find out that the seller has been lying and that's never a funny situation....
Could very much be a good screenshot but only rescaled and smoothed.
That's why I said that everyone has to make his own opinion if he trust an user/screenshot or not.
Sooner or later the buyer will find out that the seller has been lying and that's never a funny situation....
he is outstanding +2 (for a little don't incredible) and I have pulled some formidable with stamina too very betters than him. If he has more keeper... but this is too low too
I have pulled this outstanding+2 and sold him today for 7 000 $... That player could be outstanding as well...
Patrik Bednář, age 19
average stamina unsatisfactory keeper
exellent pace unsatisfatory defender
poor technique good playmaker
poor passing average striker
Patrik Bednář, age 19
average stamina unsatisfactory keeper
exellent pace unsatisfatory defender
poor technique good playmaker
poor passing average striker
I have pulled some outstandings and I sold one for 2000€ and another one is he: Wenceslao Larrosa, value: 1 137 250 €
So could be Outstanding YP.
(edited)
So could be Outstanding YP.
(edited)
don't problem for sold on 2000 euros, the problem is the skills
Today he popped in technique and pace and next week I'm starting training pace, so very soon I'll know his true talent!
^^ but this was my last formidable junior:
weak stamina
poor pace, good defender
hopeless technique, good playmaker
very good passing
!!
weak stamina
poor pace, good defender
hopeless technique, good playmaker
very good passing
!!
Sääski, yes his talent picture is fake, that player is my youth pull so I know what kind of player he was when pulled.
Jalo Sääski, age: 18
value: 902 000 kn, wage: 9 600 kn
club: Zn-united, country: Suomi
divine form, average tactical discipline
tragic stamina, tragic keeper
excellent pace, weak defender
poor technique, poor playmaker
poor passing, solid striker
Talent 3,33
talent 3,33 with graph
---
his info from my youth school
Jalo Sääski, age: 17
Value: 80500 €, wage: 1175 €
Team: FC Patella, country: Suomi
Form: very good
Tactical Discipline: tragic (0 Experience, 0 Team Work)
Stamina: tragic, Keeper: tragic
Pace: excellent, Defender: poor
Technique: poor, Playmaker: poor
Passing: poor, Striker: solid
Junior History with Club
Initial Skill: 7, Final Skill: 10 (+13,33%), weeks in Juniors: 15
Talent in Juniors: 7,5 weeks/pop
(Player posting generated by Sokker Manager)
and I don't have any reason to lie, actually bigger transfer price would bring me more money :p but I don't like at all about these fake pictures
(edited)
(edited)
Jalo Sääski, age: 18
value: 902 000 kn, wage: 9 600 kn
club: Zn-united, country: Suomi
divine form, average tactical discipline
tragic stamina, tragic keeper
excellent pace, weak defender
poor technique, poor playmaker
poor passing, solid striker
Talent 3,33
talent 3,33 with graph
---
his info from my youth school
Jalo Sääski, age: 17
Value: 80500 €, wage: 1175 €
Team: FC Patella, country: Suomi
Form: very good
Tactical Discipline: tragic (0 Experience, 0 Team Work)
Stamina: tragic, Keeper: tragic
Pace: excellent, Defender: poor
Technique: poor, Playmaker: poor
Passing: poor, Striker: solid
Junior History with Club
Initial Skill: 7, Final Skill: 10 (+13,33%), weeks in Juniors: 15
Talent in Juniors: 7,5 weeks/pop
(Player posting generated by Sokker Manager)
and I don't have any reason to lie, actually bigger transfer price would bring me more money :p but I don't like at all about these fake pictures
(edited)
(edited)
Is it really a fake? His screenshot says that he needed four weeks to poor defender, that's not good talent. Maybe he got confused using the right words (talent is junior talent and not talent in def from 2-3)...
Well, for newbies, who have a clue what talent is, but who are not really familiar with youth school talent, it is tricky.
yes it is, because that player was allready poor in defending before he bought him, so there is no way that this player could pop from hopeless to unsatisfactory and from unsatisfactory to poor in his team...
there has been only one pop in defending during that time what sääski was in his team.
that lower posting from my sokker manager data show's which skill that player had when he was promoted from youth school, so actually there has been only one pop in his new team, and that player youth school talent was 7,5weeks with magical youth coach
(edited)
there has been only one pop in defending during that time what sääski was in his team.
that lower posting from my sokker manager data show's which skill that player had when he was promoted from youth school, so actually there has been only one pop in his new team, and that player youth school talent was 7,5weeks with magical youth coach
(edited)
ah, okay, haven't seen that. anyway, very stupid fake? hmm...
