Subject: percentage of training

I have seen some differences in training when playing two full matches, only official, and only friendly. That's why I think there is some difference and I vote as it follows 100%; 95%; 85%, which is according to rules

I work under the assumption of 95% & 90% respectively.

95% and 85% seems too big a disparity to reconcile with my observations. A 10% gap would mean over the course of a season a player training in friendlies only would be ~ 1.5 weeks behind a comparable player being used in official matches. I believe that should be noticeable - and I haven't seen it. (Could just be me though :D). I think the effect is more subtle, which is why I believe the 5% gap.

then 95% for you?

for me, 95%

Anything under 90% would be a trick form the rule writer against the manager's here. ~95% is more probable.

I think it's between 90 % and 95 %..

I just want to see xD
(edited)

So how much is :

League+friendly?
League+friendly+NT?

100%

what about 90 mins of league and 10 mins of friendly? that 100% too yeah

That's right.
And the example league, friendly + NT is more than 100% but everything over 100% is useless.

i thought the benefit of playing NT matches was that you could achieve 133% training?
although clearly not from what ppl are saying so far

I'm looking for this question but we cant be sure

How can you possible get more than 100%, if I may ask?

somewhere greg wrote

official 90%
friendly 70%
NT 30 %

20% difference between offical and friendly.. that's huge imo. Bit too huge I would say..