Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: percentage of training
if 2x90minutes = 100% how can 90+10minutes be even close to 100%?
Think about it for just a moment. ;)
Think about it for just a moment. ;)
Mourinho to reddevil89
I used to put my star Adalberto 12 min. in official mach and 90 min on friendly, for being sure he will get 100% training
Mourinho to loop
of course, but I don't need be sure. I only feel safe
==================================
LOL ;)
I used to put my star Adalberto 12 min. in official mach and 90 min on friendly, for being sure he will get 100% training
Mourinho to loop
of course, but I don't need be sure. I only feel safe
==================================
LOL ;)
if 2x90minutes = 100% how can 90+10minutes be even close to 100%?
Because 100% is the limit in SK. That's why 2x90minutes = 100%. Otherwise it would've been more than 100%, obviously :)
It's kind of the same thing as infinity. infinity x infinity = infinity, after all.
(edited)
Because 100% is the limit in SK. That's why 2x90minutes = 100%. Otherwise it would've been more than 100%, obviously :)
It's kind of the same thing as infinity. infinity x infinity = infinity, after all.
(edited)
loop to Mourinho
if 2x90minutes = 100% how can 90+10minutes be even close to 100%?
Think about it for just a moment. ;)
If league is 95% and friendly 90%, then 10 min in friendly would be 10% training, plus 95% from league it would be 100%
Like if you have a player playing in NT, 95% from league and 33% from NT would give you player 100% training
(edited)
if 2x90minutes = 100% how can 90+10minutes be even close to 100%?
Think about it for just a moment. ;)
If league is 95% and friendly 90%, then 10 min in friendly would be 10% training, plus 95% from league it would be 100%
Like if you have a player playing in NT, 95% from league and 33% from NT would give you player 100% training
(edited)
Un4given to Carnavalist
yeah, extremely huge difference... but that could explain why one of my players didn't pop yet to unearthly def. I played him as a mid in Sundays and as def in Wednesdays and it looks like he is training a bit slower.
If you play him as mid in sunday and def in wed, then he just get the training from the match in Wed
From the rule:
If a player played in two different positions during the week, the last match counts
yeah, extremely huge difference... but that could explain why one of my players didn't pop yet to unearthly def. I played him as a mid in Sundays and as def in Wednesdays and it looks like he is training a bit slower.
If you play him as mid in sunday and def in wed, then he just get the training from the match in Wed
From the rule:
If a player played in two different positions during the week, the last match counts
Some of you might have missed it so I will repeat what greg said:
For a player to receive full training he has to play 2x90 minutes.
The training percentage degenerates per played minute!
90 minutes + 10 minutes is therefore not 100%.
For instance:
Playing 2x45 minutes is more training percentage than playing 1x90.
Noone knows how it is calculated though :(
(edited)
For a player to receive full training he has to play 2x90 minutes.
The training percentage degenerates per played minute!
90 minutes + 10 minutes is therefore not 100%.
For instance:
Playing 2x45 minutes is more training percentage than playing 1x90.
Noone knows how it is calculated though :(
(edited)
What do you mean by degenerating per played minute? I think you mean unplayed minute, right?
And if so, you mean a player plays each half in 2 matches will get more training than one plays only 1 full match. Why is that?
And if so, you mean a player plays each half in 2 matches will get more training than one plays only 1 full match. Why is that?
Un4given to Carnavalist
yeah, extremely huge difference... but that could explain why one of my players didn't pop yet to unearthly def. I played him as a mid in Sundays and as def in Wednesdays and it looks like he is training a bit slower.
If you play him as mid in sunday and def in wed, then he just get the training from the match in Wed
From the rule:
If a player played in two different positions during the week, the last match counts
I know that, but i thought that he his Wednesday match itself would bring him much more then 70% of training :(
yeah, extremely huge difference... but that could explain why one of my players didn't pop yet to unearthly def. I played him as a mid in Sundays and as def in Wednesdays and it looks like he is training a bit slower.
If you play him as mid in sunday and def in wed, then he just get the training from the match in Wed
From the rule:
If a player played in two different positions during the week, the last match counts
I know that, but i thought that he his Wednesday match itself would bring him much more then 70% of training :(
As said:
Training percentage degenerates per played minute in a match.
Lets make numbers up:
He plays 20 minutes in the league match = 20%
He plays 40 minutes in the league match = 38% (no 40% because it degenerates)
He plays 45 minutes in the league match = 42%
He plays 60 minutes in the league match = 52%
He plays 80 minutes in the league match = 70%
He plays 90 minutes in the league match = 75%
So two matches each 45 minutes are more than one match 90 minutes.
I made up this numbers to show you what degeneration means.
They are pure fiction only based on what greg said would be the case.
/edit
I don't know how it can be possible that the player has to play 2x90 minutes to have 100%, I don't get any close to this regardless how I calculate.
(edited)
Training percentage degenerates per played minute in a match.
Lets make numbers up:
He plays 20 minutes in the league match = 20%
He plays 40 minutes in the league match = 38% (no 40% because it degenerates)
He plays 45 minutes in the league match = 42%
He plays 60 minutes in the league match = 52%
He plays 80 minutes in the league match = 70%
He plays 90 minutes in the league match = 75%
So two matches each 45 minutes are more than one match 90 minutes.
I made up this numbers to show you what degeneration means.
They are pure fiction only based on what greg said would be the case.
/edit
I don't know how it can be possible that the player has to play 2x90 minutes to have 100%, I don't get any close to this regardless how I calculate.
(edited)
How can u make up those figures? I can't understand the calculation underlying
And also, what do you mean by "percentage degenerates per played minute in a match" ? Purely I see the sentence and think that percentage of training decreases along with the increase in minutes that a player plays....
And also, what do you mean by "percentage degenerates per played minute in a match" ? Purely I see the sentence and think that percentage of training decreases along with the increase in minutes that a player plays....
How can u make up those figures? I can't understand the calculation underlying
And also, what do you mean by "percentage degenerates per played minute in a match" ? Purely I see the sentence and think that percentage of training decreases along with the increase in minutes that a player plays....
Read my post and the figures again.
It explains it perfectly.
The longer a player plays the less additional training percentage he will get per played minute.
For the first 20minutes he gets, say 20%, but for the next 20minutes he gets say 18%.
That's what degeneration means.
(edited)
And also, what do you mean by "percentage degenerates per played minute in a match" ? Purely I see the sentence and think that percentage of training decreases along with the increase in minutes that a player plays....
Read my post and the figures again.
It explains it perfectly.
The longer a player plays the less additional training percentage he will get per played minute.
For the first 20minutes he gets, say 20%, but for the next 20minutes he gets say 18%.
That's what degeneration means.
(edited)
of course more minutes = more training
but time played is not linear with percentage of training received.
but time played is not linear with percentage of training received.
Exactly.
But there are two things that conflict with each other.
Greg told that a player has to play 2x90 minutes to really have 100%.
That would only work if the percentage degeneration was calculated for every minute played per week and not per match, but:
He told me that 2x45 minutes played per week would be more than 1x90.
Both things are not possible!
/edit
It would only be possible if there was a total week tiredness and a per match tiredness that both decreasing the total training percentage, but then again things really start to get complicated.
If gregs words are right, this is the only possible case though.
(edited)
But there are two things that conflict with each other.
Greg told that a player has to play 2x90 minutes to really have 100%.
That would only work if the percentage degeneration was calculated for every minute played per week and not per match, but:
He told me that 2x45 minutes played per week would be more than 1x90.
Both things are not possible!
/edit
It would only be possible if there was a total week tiredness and a per match tiredness that both decreasing the total training percentage, but then again things really start to get complicated.
If gregs words are right, this is the only possible case though.
(edited)
do you know how many training get a player if he play 2x45 min?
So do you think play 45 mins in league and 45 mins in friendly would give more training than 90 mins in league?