Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: Rules
my point of view, as ex-staff member: if you want somebody else to connect to your account just to transfer a player, because you can't connect... should be forbidden. You are the manager, you stay online and make the transfers.What if you have 20M euros, and the one you call 'friend' bids all the money on one player? You can never trust anybody...I don't trust anyone, if you ask me.
What should be allowed, is when you simply can't connect (from different reasons: no internet connection, you're in the army, whatever) and you ask another user just to select a tactic and the players for the following match(es). This and no more...
What should be allowed, is when you simply can't connect (from different reasons: no internet connection, you're in the army, whatever) and you ask another user just to select a tactic and the players for the following match(es). This and no more...
I don't think as you, rules should be strict so is more simple to respect it.
No exceptional case -> simple discover cheater
(edited)
No exceptional case -> simple discover cheater
(edited)
You say that you trust nobody, but I think if somebody trust a friend that's his decision and also his problem.
What I truly don't understand is how some people try to defend or excuse themselves for what is completely inexcusable.
Just say "Ooops we screw things up, from now on things are going to be X, Y and Z for everyone"
Everyone happy, nobody wants heads rolling through the cliff, no admin/mod earns a penny of this and they do it on their free time. It is ok t 0be wrong or make mistakes, as long as you recognize them and try those to not happen again.
(edited)
Just say "Ooops we screw things up, from now on things are going to be X, Y and Z for everyone"
Everyone happy, nobody wants heads rolling through the cliff, no admin/mod earns a penny of this and they do it on their free time. It is ok t 0be wrong or make mistakes, as long as you recognize them and try those to not happen again.
(edited)
okey, then we have a different opinion then.
For me sokker is some kind of "not having bloody strict" rules.
And I think having a nice community is more important than finding a cheater.
And still I don't have an answer to this:
Why shall an user have a second account where he can log in only twice a week and where he can't transfer any player to his team, neither can write anything in the forum? I don't see any reason...
For me sokker is some kind of "not having bloody strict" rules.
And I think having a nice community is more important than finding a cheater.
And still I don't have an answer to this:
Why shall an user have a second account where he can log in only twice a week and where he can't transfer any player to his team, neither can write anything in the forum? I don't see any reason...
I don't really like it.
Let's say that you just use this opportunity once, to make an example. Let's take this typical bad tactician, every tactic he creates is an utter failure. He's going on a vacation the next two weeks, some days before the vacation he hear about this way of "taking" care of sokker while gone. He asks his friend who excels at tactics, to set his line up, buy a new forward and make him several different tactics that he can use for the rest of his days in sokker.
Let's say that you just use this opportunity once, to make an example. Let's take this typical bad tactician, every tactic he creates is an utter failure. He's going on a vacation the next two weeks, some days before the vacation he hear about this way of "taking" care of sokker while gone. He asks his friend who excels at tactics, to set his line up, buy a new forward and make him several different tactics that he can use for the rest of his days in sokker.
I have two questions to all:
1. I'm assistant manager of our NT team and NT manager an me are good friends, and my question is can he come to my home and that we can make some tactic together?
2. I'm assistant manager of our NT team and NT manager an me are good friends, and my question is can I make tactic from my home with his account?
(edited)
1. I'm assistant manager of our NT team and NT manager an me are good friends, and my question is can he come to my home and that we can make some tactic together?
2. I'm assistant manager of our NT team and NT manager an me are good friends, and my question is can I make tactic from my home with his account?
(edited)
Well, that's already possible now.
Give me your password and I'd go in a internet café and set you 10 nice tactics...
that will always be possible, even with very strong rules.
Give me your password and I'd go in a internet café and set you 10 nice tactics...
that will always be possible, even with very strong rules.
First one is legitim
Second one there are written cases that it was allowed, I don't see why you shouldn't (as long as they don't change the rules since this incident)
Second one there are written cases that it was allowed, I don't see why you shouldn't (as long as they don't change the rules since this incident)
A friend of mine, who has played sokker too, wasn't really motivated. So I helped him making a new tactic and said him what for players to buy. But he has made everything on his own. But off course he has logged in some times on my computer. Do you think that's cheating?
I guess you would have to ask this "your" admin...
if he is informed, it should be ok imho, but I don't think anyone here can answer you this.
if he is informed, it should be ok imho, but I don't think anyone here can answer you this.
tell me what you want to care if you got 2 red cards in a match for defenders and an injury and you still play in the official cup??
AND:
I once really cared about sokker in holidays, I went extra to an internet café and...
SOKKER WAS DOWN!
Bad luck!
AND:
I once really cared about sokker in holidays, I went extra to an internet café and...
SOKKER WAS DOWN!
Bad luck!
This and freedom of speech
As long as the debate is reasoned and fair, the topics will probably be left open. But when it turns into a lynch mob I understand why the mods want to close the threads while debating the issue.
And because there was a hint of "all Polish are cheaters", "Borkos is a wuss", "the staff have different rules for themselves", maybe the staff felt that the discussion was going nowhere. As I wrote and as you wrote/quoted(?) there are no cheaters here, merely people acting in good faith on different sets of rules.
Ok ok, nobody actually did write "Borkos is a wuss"... until now ;-)
(edited)
As long as the debate is reasoned and fair, the topics will probably be left open. But when it turns into a lynch mob I understand why the mods want to close the threads while debating the issue.
And because there was a hint of "all Polish are cheaters", "Borkos is a wuss", "the staff have different rules for themselves", maybe the staff felt that the discussion was going nowhere. As I wrote and as you wrote/quoted(?) there are no cheaters here, merely people acting in good faith on different sets of rules.
Ok ok, nobody actually did write "Borkos is a wuss"... until now ;-)
(edited)