Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
 Topic closed!!!

Subject: Rules

2008-11-20 22:36:35
that is like telling that police officers do always favour their family and friends. Not every policeman is corrupt :) At least here in Switzerland. Same is for staff members. I would put my hand in the fire for many of the guys in admin and mod positions and yes I am sure that they do their best not to favour anyone.
Also there are many staff members. Even if one would close his eyes there can be many others that see it and then act according to the rules about it. So even if there was corrupt staff members, there is also a control from collegues and also from devs of course.
2008-11-20 22:36:38
No, I can't of course.
Afterall they are all humans and you can't even trust on the words of your best friend nowadays.
That's why there are so many of us.
2008-11-20 22:36:42
I will ask you again loop:


Did you read any of the pages here?
There are many, many reasons to allow it.
We would have lost many mod, admins and regular users already if "sitting" was not allowed.
Don't be so illiberal.
Not everything that can be abused should be forbidden.



Then you give me one reason, I ask only just onen where it should be allowed...
2008-11-20 22:37:24
We aren't the enemy.

I implore you my god, protect my from me friend, because i protect my self from enemy!
(edited)
2008-11-20 22:38:00
because, when he'll be at work, he'll loose a player on an auction :D
It's very dangerous, and in this way we can loose some users ^^
2008-11-20 22:38:13
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying every admin is a crook, I'm not even saying one is, I'm just saying that is obvious that in this case, some people are favoured above others...
2008-11-20 22:38:32
si if you find one common login you'll ban them?
2008-11-20 22:39:10
Oooh, why dind't you say that in the first place? :)

No, seriously :)
2008-11-20 22:39:22
aerts, my friend, I'm kinda tired now.

Many people have posted many different examples already.

For instance you are getting injuried and are in hospital for two weeks, shouldn't a friend be able to at least make your line ups?
2008-11-20 22:39:59
It's not all that easy.
(edited)
2008-11-20 22:40:38
It's just same if someone very "popular"(someon every body knows)would have done something terrible and he doesn't get banned. And someone else less known does the same thing but gets banned.
2008-11-20 22:40:59
for all those who quote rules, there is also this sentence:

Every case not described in the rules will be handled by Game Administrators.

in Polska we interpret "total control" more as "permanent" so cases like those with Raul and Borkos depends on admins decision
2008-11-20 22:41:52
Ok, as you wish :). Then X player didn't log in in Y account, even if he said that, he is just joking in an incredible serious matter (incredible serious at sokker level).

Sounds more believable that way. You still defending what it is inexcusable.
2008-11-20 22:41:53
so if it's not that easy your words about that case are nothing.
(edited)
2008-11-20 22:42:01
For instance you are getting injuried and are in hospital for two weeks, shouldn't a friend be able to at least make your line ups?

you friend should be able to activate holiday mode

or this is a game, more friends you have, more quickly you progress?
2008-11-20 22:42:05
How the hell are you going to ask permittion to the admins if someone can log in on your team,when you're in the hospital? :d