Subject: Rules

I think the main problem is... that the first country was Poland, the ones that made this game popular and made it survive at the beginning were... Poland users. So it is "reasonable" that at that point some kind of "flexibility" was allowed. Then sokker grew, as in every community at any level, when you grow you need to be more clear and strict, but still that "flexibilty" was still allowed with the "first" users.
I don't want any banned users or anything, but it is a good time to unify concepts here...
(edited)

Please read my whole answer...

As one of the first who made a protest in the world cup topic I am glad this is not putted away in a corner and no one is looking at it anymore.
It is one day ahead and I still find it redicilaus that it did happen.

There is only one way to keep it controlable and that is no tolerance. Anyone knows what are the rules and it is clear for everyone.

for me it's not the same thing.

A user shortly checking my "sokker-things" isn't what I call cheating and in my opinion it's not cheating at all.

Please read my whole answer...

I did it.IMHO the reply is more or less the same even in the different cases,'cos i deeply desagree with this kind of "permissions".

tell me what you want to care if you got 2 red cards in a match for defenders and an injury and you still play in the official cup??

AND:
I once really cared about sokker in holidays, I went extra to an internet café and...

SOKKER WAS DOWN!


Great man, really great.

There are still circumstances where it is not possible and not the users fault and he needs help!
For instance, I broke my ankle playing a football match on saturday evening and had a transport to the hospital.
Needed to stay there for 2 weeks.
Not only that I have lost all my hobbies (football, bowling, etc.) for half a year and not being able to walk for 2 month I should also lose my team training?
You cannot argue it away, there are real reasons for having the possiblity to give someone else the password.

President User A took control over the team. (2005-04-11)

President sydval took control over the team. (2005-04-07)



i'm more storical but i've never had the behaviour that he confessed
(edited)

I think the main problem is... that the first country was Poland, the ones that made this game popular and made it survive at the beginning were... Poland users. So it is "reasonable" that at that point some kind of "flexibility" was allowed. Then sokker grew, as in every community at any level, when you grow you need to be more clear and strict, but still that "flexibilty" was still allowed with the "first" users.
I don't want any banned users or anything, but it is a good time to unify concepts here...

I agree.

You are right.
There are as many good reasons to allow it as there are bad reasons to disallow it.

I once really cared about sokker in holidays, I went extra to an internet café and...

SOKKER WAS DOWN!


Man, excuse me, but i guess it would been down also if u were at home ^_^

yep. but buying players isn't one of them :>

You are right.
There are as many good reasons to allow it as there are bad reasons to disallow it.

well...

i can accept this

but WHY this could be allowed just for few people (admin, mod or ex-mod)???


WHY?????????

tell me why please.
Does anyone get the slightest disadvantage if another user checks my formation, pulls my youth players and fires the bad ones.

The other user does of course not change tactic, transfer players etc.

I really don't see any disadvantage for anybody in this case. And of course I know users (even personally) who will for sure not do anything except the things I mentioned.

I think the main problem is... that the first country was Poland, the ones that made this game popular and made it survive at the beginning were... Poland users. So it is "reasonable" that at that point some kind of "flexibility" was allowed. Then sokker grew, as in every community at any level, when you grow you need to be more clear and strict, but still that "flexibilty" was still allowed with the "first" users.
I don't want any banned users or anything, but it is a good time to unify concepts here...

I fyou read the old pages I wote that in my opinion there are limited situations that can be valutated by admins..

Man, excuse me, but i guess it would been down also if u were at home ^_^

Do you mean that seriously??

At home I log in 2 hours later, but on holiday I can't just wait 2 hours or even longer...