Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
 Topic closed!!!

Subject: Rules

2008-11-20 18:42:50
Man, excuse me, but i guess it would been down also if u were at home ^_^

Do you mean that seriously??

At home I log in 2 hours later, but on holiday I can't just wait 2 hours or even longer...
2008-11-20 18:43:31
no, it doesn't.
2008-11-20 18:43:45
if I allow (admin) to enter someone in someone else account

everything could happen also having TOTAL CONTROL of the team (as user A and user B confessed even talking about small favours...it needs courage calling them small favours) so what about the rule "1 team 1 person"???
(edited)
2008-11-20 18:44:14
but WHY this could be allowed just for few people (admin, mod or ex-mod)???

This is not the case.
I have also allowed it to a couple of users from Austria.
The admin guidline is not clear here and we need and will work on that.
2008-11-20 18:44:46
Yep some circunstances, buying players with X user since X user can't login at that time is not one of them. Making the tactic of an NT squad because it's difficult to login for 3 days is not one of those circumstances.

Don't put 2 innocents and 10 guilty people in the same cell and justify that since there are 2 innocents there you are going to free everyone...

PS: I don't think banning people is the answer, just it's time to unify criteria..
(edited)
2008-11-20 18:45:12
it's not only allowed to them.

There is an example of a Swiss manager logging in for another team 1 or 2 times a week to set his formation and check the youths.


The other manager is on a world trip and has rarely connection to the internet but doesn't wanna lose his team.
He will be back in some months I guess and then will of course change is password and manage his old team.

I don't see anything wrong with that.
And of course: no transfers, no tactics etc as written in my last answer.


And it's not like we have thouands of managers, so that we don't have to care about each one who wants to play sokker.
2008-11-20 18:46:54
The admin guidline is not clear here and we need and will work on that.

it should be clear since the start of the game...
2008-11-20 18:47:49
Does anyone get the slightest disadvantage if another user checks my formation, pulls my youth players and fires the bad ones.

Sure, if the situation is always clear and correct, but what give us the security that somebody get advantage from this possibility and stole/destroy the full team of somebody else after he have been enter in the trust of another user?

These kind of situations happened thousends and thousends of times in all online games.
2008-11-20 18:48:18

everything could happen also having TOTAL CONTROL of the team (as user A and user B confessed even talking about small favours...it needs courage calling them small favours) so what about the rule "1 team 1 person"???


Well, if you don't trust anybody, go home and keep there...
(I don't mean that seriously, but you see what I mean: sometimes you simply have to trust people. And if you see, that there are never transfers when user X is online and that the tactic is always the same, you can somehow control this. And I'm a 100% sure, that I can call you 5 Swiss user who would NOT abuse the log-in at onother account.)
2008-11-20 18:48:20
tell me why please.
Does anyone get the slightest disadvantage if another user checks my formation, pulls my youth players and fires the bad ones.

The other user does of course not change tactic, transfer players etc.

I really don't see any disadvantage for anybody in this case. And of course I know users (even personally) who will for sure not do anything except the things I mentioned.


how will admins know what was he doing with your team???
2008-11-20 18:48:36
it's not only allowed to them.

There is an example of a Swiss manager logging in for another team 1 or 2 times a week to set his formation and check the youths.




i think that their groupmates are very happy to compete with another person...really???
2008-11-20 18:49:31
2008-11-20 18:49:34
At home I log in 2 hours later, but on holiday I can't just wait 2 hours or even longer...

It's not the 5 minutes u have to come back to a cafè that change ur life or vocations
2008-11-20 18:49:40
Well, if you don't trust anybody, go home and keep there...


typical answer of people that know they're wrong

my compliments

:D
2008-11-20 18:49:50

how will admins know what was he doing with your team???


That the main question!!! Is incredible hard to control that.... hence... don't let people login with other accounts.
2008-11-20 18:50:20
Sure, if the situation is always clear and correct, but what give us the security that somebody get advantage from this possibility and stole/destroy the full team of somebody else after he have been enter in the trust of another user?

well, if he destroys my team, it's my fault.

But I'm a 100% sure, that if I'd chose a user to "replace" me for some weeks, he would not abuse anything.

Man, not all the users are evil and want to cheat...