Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: World Cup Qualifying
Should have been 0-2 after half an hour already :(
Tactics werent that perfect, 3 defenders were unavailable and replacements had form issues, but there wasnt any better ...
Gutted, disappointed ... whatever, go Australia!
Tactics werent that perfect, 3 defenders were unavailable and replacements had form issues, but there wasnt any better ...
Gutted, disappointed ... whatever, go Australia!
Was wondering why België is so weak but found the reason when saw who the coach is. Find it hard to believe that you'll be in the top-50 after this season with you...
One of the greatest strategies ever shown for a match between a biggie and a rising country.
(edited)
(edited)
Uruguay 2 : 1 Lietuva
Sorry... I don't know how to say "VAMOS CARAJO" in English.
Sorry... I don't know how to say "VAMOS CARAJO" in English.
those two countries are on similar level, you little bit underestimate yourself
Nah. Uruguay is much weaker, and had loads of luck.
Kaz Taylor - Brasil 1-1 :)
played today against Kaz Taylor...amazing GK! :/
22 shots, most of them after 1 on 1, and only 5 goals. 3 of those goals were scored on empty goal.
played today against Kaz Taylor...amazing GK! :/
22 shots, most of them after 1 on 1, and only 5 goals. 3 of those goals were scored on empty goal.
It seems that when we loose is the logical thing to happened and when we win we are lucky...
Actually I don't care how we won... we did it, we are 1st on the group and we are enjoying the moment... to bad that instead or being happy for the "little one" some people is jealous for his own inefficiency.
Actually I don't care how we won... we did it, we are 1st on the group and we are enjoying the moment... to bad that instead or being happy for the "little one" some people is jealous for his own inefficiency.
Actually I don't care how we won...
Perhaps you don't, but I would be pissed of if my team needed 19 shots to score only 1 goal, while the opponent needed only 4 to score 2 goals.
we did it, we are 1st on the group and we are enjoying the moment...
Then be happy about it and enjoy the moment! Having nothing to do with either sides, I just don't think it's a fair win at all. That's all :)
to bad that instead or being happy for the "little one" some people is jealous for his own inefficiency.
Jealous? Inefficient? With Hong Kong I needed only 1 shot to score 1 goal. Against Danmark, with arguably one of, if not the best GK in Sokker :p
Perhaps you don't, but I would be pissed of if my team needed 19 shots to score only 1 goal, while the opponent needed only 4 to score 2 goals.
we did it, we are 1st on the group and we are enjoying the moment...
Then be happy about it and enjoy the moment! Having nothing to do with either sides, I just don't think it's a fair win at all. That's all :)
to bad that instead or being happy for the "little one" some people is jealous for his own inefficiency.
Jealous? Inefficient? With Hong Kong I needed only 1 shot to score 1 goal. Against Danmark, with arguably one of, if not the best GK in Sokker :p
Perhaps you don't, but I would be pissed of if my team needed 19 shots to score only 1 goal, while the opponent needed only 4 to score 2 goals.
That's efficiency. I'm not pissed off. I'm proud that a country with very few users can manage to win.
With Hong Kong I needed only 1 shot to score 1 goal.
With your way of thinking, you just were lucky... or that was efficiency... If you do it you are efficient If we do it we are lucky... :(
too bad for you...
(edited)
Thanks God Sokker has a tactical system that doesnt leave everything in the hands of random (as oHTer games do ;) ).
Uruguayan tactical squeme was a good one, was a thought one and we foresaw what was going to happen before it happened (unfortunatelly everything is in a private forum... otherwise I would show you). The lithuanians used the same tactique they used in the previous match...
And of course we needed luck to win (every weak team needs it in order to win against a much powerfull country), but most of you seem to put everything on random and thats not true (fortunatelly for the game).
We do have a lot of merit... specially the NT coach: Mr.200.
And BTW: the extremelly low scoring rate is something you should talk to devs, and not bring it up when it doesnt benefit someone. In this case, as you should know, striking skill weight in scoring was reduced a lot because too much goals per game were being scored... and according to devs this has no easy solution: if scoring rate is brought back to the old days level, matches would end 10-7 and so.
(edited)
Uruguayan tactical squeme was a good one, was a thought one and we foresaw what was going to happen before it happened (unfortunatelly everything is in a private forum... otherwise I would show you). The lithuanians used the same tactique they used in the previous match...
And of course we needed luck to win (every weak team needs it in order to win against a much powerfull country), but most of you seem to put everything on random and thats not true (fortunatelly for the game).
We do have a lot of merit... specially the NT coach: Mr.200.
And BTW: the extremelly low scoring rate is something you should talk to devs, and not bring it up when it doesnt benefit someone. In this case, as you should know, striking skill weight in scoring was reduced a lot because too much goals per game were being scored... and according to devs this has no easy solution: if scoring rate is brought back to the old days level, matches would end 10-7 and so.
(edited)