Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Junior - good to solid
--/-- so first up could 've been after the third week.
thinking about it: i have a younster who came in as good, popped after 4 weeks.. maybe i'll be able to prove if he had sublevel when entering (if he pops after 5 weeks once)
this must be the first time i'm hoping a youth player doesn't have talent under 4 :p
this must be the first time i'm hoping a youth player doesn't have talent under 4 :p
This subject could be interested if i could understand ti :-(... Fir that, i tried out to find a player that meets your requirements :
here is junior coming out good
Now, could you expose your theory with this example i give you please. Thanks a lot :-)
here is junior coming out good
Now, could you expose your theory with this example i give you please. Thanks a lot :-)
:S
if you only mase that print screen a week earlier....
like this it dosnet proove anything (max weeks on plus junior screen -> maybe weeks missing)
if you only mase that print screen a week earlier....
like this it dosnet proove anything (max weeks on plus junior screen -> maybe weeks missing)
Hmmm... Please,ould you explain to me why U said that i had to made this screen a week earlier because i made it a month ago ? :-( I do not understand what you mean.
Thus, i'd like you explain to me what is the meaning of your last sentence... Dificult to understand too :-(... Finally, i'd like to understand what could be proven please ?
Thank to U :-)
Thus, i'd like you explain to me what is the meaning of your last sentence... Dificult to understand too :-(... Finally, i'd like to understand what could be proven please ?
Thank to U :-)
Problem is as far as I understood, that a plus screen shows 11 weeks and your screen shows 11 weeks, too. So it could be that he came into school 12 weeks before you made the screen. If you did it a week earlier, you have 10 weeks on the screen which proofs that the start of the screen is exactly when the junior came into your school.
in your screen we can see that the player starts from good and goes to solid in 2 weeks
but, you show 11 weeks(collums / squares) in that "plus" screen" which is the maximum for a "plus" screen
if you made the screen a week earlier - good -> solid in two weeks but only 10 weeks(10 collums) shown in the "plus" screen it was a 100% proof
but, you show 11 weeks(collums / squares) in that "plus" screen" which is the maximum for a "plus" screen
if you made the screen a week earlier - good -> solid in two weeks but only 10 weeks(10 collums) shown in the "plus" screen it was a 100% proof
Ah ok, thxs ! :-)... That's more clear indeed... And yes, indeed i can't prove what you see, i'd like to take that screen because i could see all of the pops.
But now, if you consider i'm not liar, could you explain to me what you understand in this screen to tell me about your theory please ? :-)
But now, if you consider i'm not liar, could you explain to me what you understand in this screen to tell me about your theory please ? :-)
that a junior that comes to youth school with "good" as a starting level
can come as a 7.2~ junior (has some sub skill)
can come as a 7.2~ junior (has some sub skill)
i for one, believe that a juniors max level when entering youth squad is 7.0 (good without sublevel), thusfar there is no evidence of believing otherwise..
maybe you should look over this thread. Very much evidence that it is clearly higher than 7.0. The only question we have now is how much?
yes, Udo Gansen on page 2 for example popped with plus screen ---/----/
(edited)
(edited)