Subject: Is Sokker dying?

The game cannot die. Old users quit, new users come and fill their spots. The circle keeps on going :P
(edited)

for point 2) sure it needs no modification, i think it's very realistic to get a very good striker with divine or more in the main skills alone in front of the keeper shooting directly on the corner flag.
for point 3) can you tell me the last time when sokker get a significative evolution ?
Except visuals nothing new.

it depends of your country, in ours the number of users is clearly falling.
The developpers or Administrators shouldn't forget that's the players that are paying for plus who pay them and the servers.
No more users equal no more game
The new users generally don't take plus immediately, they are waiting to see if the game is good or not
(edited)

actually, a game can evolve for the worse, I think. But that doens't mean you should be pessimistic about possible changes for the game.

another thing: a few RL years ago HT went through an economic recession when their userbase stagnated. Is sokker going through the same situation? (I guess so) - And how are devs dealing with this/Is there an economic egg-head who's working at an analysis? (there were plenty of those in ht)

I'm studying genetic engineering. Guess whether I am a creationist or not ;)

so for you , a divine striker always needs to score with 1 on 1? And thus, a 'weak' striker has to fail all the time? Boy, this isnt a game that is purely based on statistics. And yes, ever heard about hitting the ball wrong? I guess it didnt happen 5 times in a match ...

the striker can miss but shooting so far from the target ... and the corner flag was only an example.

well, bad touch ...

the ME's biggest problem is completely random heading system. it makes crosses ridicilously effective...and also the ME probably doesn't seem worth anything to newbies who can't understand why their players are braindead.

true and true :)

I'm pretty sure that that Beatles fan was being sarcastic ;-)

oh, I see. so what survived natural selection is not good enough for you. you need to play God. there you lost the greenies. Deeply isolated, you probably comfort yourself with the thought that you and the creationist bunch are actually think-alikes. But guess what, they won't dig that either, because you're playing with what God in her perfection created.

I bet you already know that, but here it is again:
you don't have a lot of friends left out there, sir.

oh, I see. so what survived natural selection is not good enough for you.

No. He said, rightfully so, that evolution itself is not about good or bad. The theory of evolution is about explaining the gradual development of something.

you need to play God. there you lost the greenies. Deeply isolated, you probably comfort yourself with the thought that you and the creationist bunch are actually think-alikes.

Funny, coming from someone who doesn't even know what the definition of evolution is.

But guess what, they won't dig that either, because you're playing with what God in her perfection created.

Did you see the movie Dogma? :)

I bet you already know that, but here it is again:
you don't have a lot of friends left out there, sir.

Gotta agree with this point though.

jesus, buddy, way to kill a joke, even one as lame as mine.

Yeah, I could appreciate the sarcasm at first, but had to correct stuff.

Seriously though, how did you find out so fast that langhe is a female god with no friends? Took me decades..