Subject: Is Sokker dying?

I am talking about the difference between leagues. You can't put a team in the last div in a small country earning the same as they earn now, and raise the incomes of the first div teams comparing them to the 1st div of a big country. I.e.:

Spain
1 div: 266k Euro
2 div: 225k Euro - difference: -15%
3 div: 190k Euro - diff: - 15.55%
4 div: 170k Euro - diff: - 11%
5 div: 60k Euro - diff -64

Now, what you're saying is that in a small country, it would be liek this:
1 div: 266k Euro
2 div:
3 div: 60k Euro - doyou think witrh 200k Euro difference, a new team has any remote chance of promoting to 1st? :)

Maybe you tell me that the solution is to raise also the incomes of the new teams, but that would create a lot of inflation which would be good at first, but then it would make a crisis much worse than the one in rl xD

where on earth did i write that i suggest that?

function of sponsor money cap should simply be a combination of age and division of team
counting from the top, not from the bottom....
(edited)

i'm not sure about that...

I don't know much about economics, but I guess you know even less...

as paradoxaly as it may sound, that is what people usually think about economists....

So, are you an economist? Then explain to me which is the origin of this crisis :)

basically flaws in regulatory policies for banks, including deposit insurance, capital requirements liquidity and so on... once lemans brothers collapsed, world went into panic and that was a snowball effect....

Sorry to interrupt, but... is sokker dying because of Lehman Brothers? :-O

:P

Back to topic? :)
(edited)

You're forgetting the economic bubble, specially in the real estate sector. If we raise the incomes of all the teams (it would be unfair to raise only some of them!), then we would create a bubble that would end exploding like in rl. Actually, there was a high inflation not so many season ago as you said, and the system can't support that raise for long time.

Anyway, fortunately what you have proposed won't be implemented, so this makes no sense :P

We just ended up repeating ourselves..

[URL=http://img18.imageshack.us/i/marmotai.jpg/][/URL]

The supporter thing may have played in to the deflation - weekly incomes are down. So are amounts people are spending on players (except 17 and 18 year olds, that is).

weekly incomes are down

it can't be true because mood's system is symetrical. if your suporters going upset, the mood of suporters of your opponent rising. same his income from tickets.

global income should be quite constant
(edited)

It is not symmetrical by what I have observed.

so what have you observed?