Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: Is Sokker dying?
of course they are :) what other things would have influence on them in your opinion?
The always awesome random ;-)
The always awesome random ;-)
We need improves for the match viewer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
greg has spoken on the new ideas and improvement:
http://online.sokker.org/forum_topic.php?ID_forum=1261&ID_topic=1892341&pg=1
(edited)
http://online.sokker.org/forum_topic.php?ID_forum=1261&ID_topic=1892341&pg=1
(edited)
"so what have you observed?"
Just a few results that have had feedback from those involved at the time that ended up I rise they stay the same, they stay the same I drop etc.
Just a few results that have had feedback from those involved at the time that ended up I rise they stay the same, they stay the same I drop etc.
Just a few results that have had feedback from those involved at the time that ended up I rise they stay the same, they stay the same I drop etc.
Again you're choosing to ignore sublevels here. Sublevels make a huge difference. You might drop say 0.7 of a level and the other gain 0.7 of a level and it might appear as if the winner gained 0 levels and you dropped a level.
Conversely, it's possible that the winner is close to jumping a level and the loser is just under the next level, that the winner gains a level and the loser doesn't.
A 3rd possibility is that neither change. The winner is only just past a level, the loser is just under a level and the change in mood isnt big enough for either to gain/lose enough to make it appear like you've dropped a level.
Doesn't mean you still haven't changed supporter mood.
Again, you like to ignore sublevels (we've been there before), but they're there and they operate behind the scenes.
I'm not entirely sure if it's symmetrical or not, though I'd imagine it could well be. The way you could disprove that if is 1 person fell 3 levels another didn't rise or something like that.
Again you're choosing to ignore sublevels here. Sublevels make a huge difference. You might drop say 0.7 of a level and the other gain 0.7 of a level and it might appear as if the winner gained 0 levels and you dropped a level.
Conversely, it's possible that the winner is close to jumping a level and the loser is just under the next level, that the winner gains a level and the loser doesn't.
A 3rd possibility is that neither change. The winner is only just past a level, the loser is just under a level and the change in mood isnt big enough for either to gain/lose enough to make it appear like you've dropped a level.
Doesn't mean you still haven't changed supporter mood.
Again, you like to ignore sublevels (we've been there before), but they're there and they operate behind the scenes.
I'm not entirely sure if it's symmetrical or not, though I'd imagine it could well be. The way you could disprove that if is 1 person fell 3 levels another didn't rise or something like that.
As I said these were my observations and seeing that we can't see sub levels I can't comment on those.
I would imagine that it will be quite hard to see evidence of multiple level drops and rises in symmetry especially for 3 levels.
I would imagine that it will be quite hard to see evidence of multiple level drops and rises in symmetry especially for 3 levels.
I would imagine that it will be quite hard to see evidence of multiple level drops and rises in symmetry especially for 3 levels.
I don't think so. What might make it hard is finding people who have the right mood to drop without hitting the cap at either end of the line. If it's symmetrical you'd find them easy enough. Qualifiers should do the trick there I should imagine.
I don't think so. What might make it hard is finding people who have the right mood to drop without hitting the cap at either end of the line. If it's symmetrical you'd find them easy enough. Qualifiers should do the trick there I should imagine.
Sponsor income has nothing directly to do with supporter mood - I think most experienced users are aware it's to do with league prestige and fanclub sizes ;) If a team bots in your league your sponsor income decreases - that ain't anything to do with supporter mood.
That's the whole reason why it would be hard, for 3 levels you need both teams on fan mood level 4 and a big enough swing result to make it happen.
It is linked with fan mood as well as prestige and fan base, I don't understand how you can say that it isn't.
I was on the top fan mood at the start of the season and now I am on the bottom level and my income is much less now then it was.
I was on the top fan mood at the start of the season and now I am on the bottom level and my income is much less now then it was.
Because I'm guessing your fan club size has decreased this season as a consequence of your bed results... Before you say it's the same thing I'll stop you. It's not :) You can have fans leave after a gain in mood and fans join after a drop in mood.
There is a certain amount of mirroring that would go on but if you follow it carefully you will sometimes see a sponsor decrease when there's no corresponding fan mood decrease.
There is a certain amount of mirroring that would go on but if you follow it carefully you will sometimes see a sponsor decrease when there's no corresponding fan mood decrease.
this is not topic about your supporters dying but about sokker dying, omg