Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: Is Sokker dying?
Sokker is dying because we focus to much on what we have now on Sokker...., we have to focus on the special things people want, such as the 3D viewer!
This big and nice new thing should be on front page when you log in directly!
This it what new people want to see, because no other online soccer manager has this!
There are enough soccer managers with things we talk abou here above, nothing special.
(edited)
This big and nice new thing should be on front page when you log in directly!
This it what new people want to see, because no other online soccer manager has this!
There are enough soccer managers with things we talk abou here above, nothing special.
(edited)
because no other online soccer manager has this!
You are wrong about this but I will be fair enough not to advertise.
(edited)
You are wrong about this but I will be fair enough not to advertise.
(edited)
my last match played in 3D
The matches before yesterday have a different 3D-engine, i.e. no stadium. In your future matches you will see your stands and supporters.
The matches before yesterday have a different 3D-engine, i.e. no stadium. In your future matches you will see your stands and supporters.
Poey: because no other online soccer manager has this!
ManagerZone has had 3D since more than 5 years ago, but the match engine is inferior than Sokker´s ME.
I prefer UltimateManager though, although it has a 2D viewer like Sokker´s 2D viewer.
Anyway, this new 3D thing in Sokker is nice.
Best Match Viewer:
1st place) ManagerZone [3D]
2nd place) Sokker [3D]
3rd place) UltimateManager [2D]
Best Match Engine:
1st place) UltimateManager
2nd place) Sokker
3rd place) ManagerZone
Best Tactical-Strategic game:
1st place) UltimateManager
2nd place) Sokker
3rd place) ManagerZone
These are my opinions. So dont get mad if you dont agree.
(edited)
ManagerZone has had 3D since more than 5 years ago, but the match engine is inferior than Sokker´s ME.
I prefer UltimateManager though, although it has a 2D viewer like Sokker´s 2D viewer.
Anyway, this new 3D thing in Sokker is nice.
Best Match Viewer:
1st place) ManagerZone [3D]
2nd place) Sokker [3D]
3rd place) UltimateManager [2D]
Best Match Engine:
1st place) UltimateManager
2nd place) Sokker
3rd place) ManagerZone
Best Tactical-Strategic game:
1st place) UltimateManager
2nd place) Sokker
3rd place) ManagerZone
These are my opinions. So dont get mad if you dont agree.
(edited)
ManagerZone has had 3D since more than 5 years ago, but the match engine is inferior than Sokker´s ME.
I did'nt know that but still there are not a lot of managers who have this indeed :)
I did'nt know that but still there are not a lot of managers who have this indeed :)
UM has tragic match viewer and as for strategic part...not really :P
no idea about the match engine, never really cared for it
no idea about the match engine, never really cared for it
Its a matter of opinion. I have always remembered you being a hater of UM since day 1. :P
Although the match viewer on UM was better than Sokker, until this week. With the implementation of the 3D viewer, now the Sokker 3D viewer is superior than the UM match viewer.
You cant tell me that the poor Sokker 2D viewer with no stadium, no public and no nothing can be better than a viewer that looks more realistic with stadium, public, etc. Now with the 3D the tables turned again, and its a good thing that each game keeps improving and getting better and better.
Like I said, its a matter of opinion.
Although the match viewer on UM was better than Sokker, until this week. With the implementation of the 3D viewer, now the Sokker 3D viewer is superior than the UM match viewer.
You cant tell me that the poor Sokker 2D viewer with no stadium, no public and no nothing can be better than a viewer that looks more realistic with stadium, public, etc. Now with the 3D the tables turned again, and its a good thing that each game keeps improving and getting better and better.
Like I said, its a matter of opinion.
come on, the players in UM run with the ball like retards, I don't care if I can see the stadium :p
the players in UM run with the ball like retards
I dont know what game you have been playing. Clearly not UM. At least not with the new ME.
I dont know what game you have been playing. Clearly not UM. At least not with the new ME.
If the demo on the website is showing a match in the new ME, well, then it's crap.
The new ME was implemented 2 weeks ago.
My question is, how can you say its atrocious if you havent played it. I mean the tactics work very well and it has more tactical options than sokker. You can choose parameter to play short passes up to long passes, and the tactical positioning you can choose 12 to 48 squares for defensive action and 12 to 48 squares for offensive actions. If you want a detailed and complex tactic you edit your tactic using 48 squares for defensive action and 48 squares for offensive action. If you want a less detailed and more direct tactic you go 12 squares DEF and 12 squares OFF. You can go 16-48 or 20-40, etc etc. I mean, how can you talk about the match engine if you dont know or havent even tried to make a tactic?. The tactical aspect is wonderful and better than Sokker in my opinion. And I have played both games for a long time. Like I said this is my opinion.
Low lvl sokker matches, the players play dumb and drop the ball outbounds very often.
High lvl sokker matches, are like ping pong games.
Instead in UM, I see more fluid passing and gaming: (with my tactics of course)
#1
#2
#3
These are only three, but my team plays a lot like that, of course, not all teams play like this, because not many people dedicate as much time in their tactics as I do.
Im not trying to convince anyone, but I would like to see some good fluid sokker plays with a lot of passing and quality like the ones above.
(edited)
My question is, how can you say its atrocious if you havent played it. I mean the tactics work very well and it has more tactical options than sokker. You can choose parameter to play short passes up to long passes, and the tactical positioning you can choose 12 to 48 squares for defensive action and 12 to 48 squares for offensive actions. If you want a detailed and complex tactic you edit your tactic using 48 squares for defensive action and 48 squares for offensive action. If you want a less detailed and more direct tactic you go 12 squares DEF and 12 squares OFF. You can go 16-48 or 20-40, etc etc. I mean, how can you talk about the match engine if you dont know or havent even tried to make a tactic?. The tactical aspect is wonderful and better than Sokker in my opinion. And I have played both games for a long time. Like I said this is my opinion.
Low lvl sokker matches, the players play dumb and drop the ball outbounds very often.
High lvl sokker matches, are like ping pong games.
Instead in UM, I see more fluid passing and gaming: (with my tactics of course)
#1
#2
#3
These are only three, but my team plays a lot like that, of course, not all teams play like this, because not many people dedicate as much time in their tactics as I do.
Im not trying to convince anyone, but I would like to see some good fluid sokker plays with a lot of passing and quality like the ones above.
(edited)
Stop promoting other managergames here.
If you don't like sokker, leave it.But don't make others to leave to.We here work for more users, for promotion of this game and not for lose our actually people.
If you don't like sokker, leave it.But don't make others to leave to.We here work for more users, for promotion of this game and not for lose our actually people.
:-)
Instead of congratulate yourself for playing such good in UM which has a really crappy ME (the viewer is not that bad with the stadium but the way that players move is really poor), maybe you can begin to dedicate more time on tactics in SK, no ?
Instead of congratulate yourself for playing such good in UM which has a really crappy ME (the viewer is not that bad with the stadium but the way that players move is really poor), maybe you can begin to dedicate more time on tactics in SK, no ?