Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: oSokker
Just look how ugly the HTML code of sokker is.
And now imagine the PHP code ;-).
And now imagine the PHP code ;-).
For instance:
I have 1.8 GHz processor. 4GB RAM.
When i start Sokker Viewer, then processor goes to 50% (100% of one core).
I have 1.8 GHz processor. 4GB RAM.
When i start Sokker Viewer, then processor goes to 50% (100% of one core).
Nope: If it was programmed in C++ or C#, then it would be faster, more effective, less ram consuming and less CPU using :-).
I learn C++ in my school :)
maybe for a month I will try to learn something about JAVA (I guess it isnt much different than C++ :-) )
maybe for a month I will try to learn something about JAVA (I guess it isnt much different than C++ :-) )
I remember looking at some source code once - I'd love to see you convert all THAT *shiver* into C++ :P
Did you study computer science?
If you did, you should know that the quality of an application is mainly determined by the algorithm/design and not by the programming language. The difference would be negligible if you'd really code the exact same thing in C++ or C#. But whatever ;-)
If you did, you should know that the quality of an application is mainly determined by the algorithm/design and not by the programming language. The difference would be negligible if you'd really code the exact same thing in C++ or C#. But whatever ;-)
Yes i did.
Its not correct. ;-)
The problem of Java is the runtime environment, what is doing all the bad things i described ;-).
Compiled C++ programs do not need runtime environment and therefore they are faster and more efficient :-P.
Its not correct. ;-)
The problem of Java is the runtime environment, what is doing all the bad things i described ;-).
Compiled C++ programs do not need runtime environment and therefore they are faster and more efficient :-P.
what is formula anaconda write it?
i don't understand.
is it school project?
i don't understand.
is it school project?
if i am correct it is mathematical prove for 1+1=2
whooaaa...what a long way to proove it..
very good anaconda..
i never learn that formula on school...
very good anaconda..
i never learn that formula on school...