Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »news Match Engine Changes
Chelse@ F.C. - PartyTime 3:2
47% Possession 53%
74% Play in the half 26%
6 Shots 27
Chelsea - Barcelona in Sokker...
GK is imbalance...
(edited)
(edited)
47% Possession 53%
74% Play in the half 26%
6 Shots 27
Chelsea - Barcelona in Sokker...
GK is imbalance...
(edited)
(edited)
Borkos, I couldnt agree more. And that is why I also think is normal that Langhe´s excellent goalkeeper did a poor job in general. You cant expect, "realistically" that a goalie of that level can stop shots from a brilliant to higher striker most of the time. So his defense has to be very good to avoid many shots on goal. I totally agree that if an excellent goalie blocks many shots, than a divine one will block all of them.
LowPing, I will watch your game now. Though one thing.. I think your link is wrong.. it makes me go to a different match.
LowPing, I will watch your game now. Though one thing.. I think your link is wrong.. it makes me go to a different match.
and what about top form of world class strikers?
What about the changes about keepers are a little bit more lame now, especially on short distance?
What about the changes about keepers are a little bit more lame now, especially on short distance?
there are not so lame..my strikers hit so much shoots today from 1 to 1 situation and no results
Well, there is not a big problem... ME looks normal... but strikers, TOP level strikers must score more!
That's all :)
Too many shots - to less goals.
That's all :)
Too many shots - to less goals.
Guys... it would be VERY weird if the ME works different for different users... so lets try and find the reasons why.
Makes no sense for one user to say the strikers never score... and others to say the Gks never block.
So something has got to give.... and the form will certainly be an issue.
I dont have the answers, but I will look on both your games to see what I can say about them.
Makes no sense for one user to say the strikers never score... and others to say the Gks never block.
So something has got to give.... and the form will certainly be an issue.
I dont have the answers, but I will look on both your games to see what I can say about them.
So. My first impressions was that your strikers were too far back and I could already foresee that there will probably be too many shots from far away which are harder to make. Which was indeed the case in the first 30 minutes.
You almost scored on the first shot, the opponent goalkeeper touched it to the side and the defensive player kicked it out of play.
The opponent got his first goal due to a very good breakaway... definitely a risk of playing WAY up high with your defensive line against a forward that probably has a high level of defense to steal the ball.
Then they get a good header that I would not doubt due to the very poor form of your goalie, he didnt manage to stop it.
Your team kept shooting mainly from far away all the first half...
I will see the second half now.
You almost scored on the first shot, the opponent goalkeeper touched it to the side and the defensive player kicked it out of play.
The opponent got his first goal due to a very good breakaway... definitely a risk of playing WAY up high with your defensive line against a forward that probably has a high level of defense to steal the ball.
Then they get a good header that I would not doubt due to the very poor form of your goalie, he didnt manage to stop it.
Your team kept shooting mainly from far away all the first half...
I will see the second half now.
Now I see the third goal... I will not defend the ME entirely because I dont know the % of changed they´ve made... if I was you I would certainly be upset to not score from far away if the opponent DID! But again, the form is really important... specially on a goalie. A player on the field may have bad form but hopefully he will not touch the ball as much and they will pass it to someone else. If the goalie has bad form... that is crucial.
At the 81th minute you got a very good chance that could have been a goal.
Then your first goal came with the first great passing shot through the defense in the entire game. That was a great goal.
And your 2nd goal was the weirdest of all... but a goal non the less.
Personally, though I cant fully commit to the ME not having something to do with this because we dont know.
Your tactic was a bad chosen one. You took a chance at thinking that the opponent would play with their defense way up high like yours and you had your strikers very low on the pitch. THAT alone eliminated a very good chance of scoring. I would expect for a high level goalie at his highest form to be able to catch most if not all of those far away shots.
Next time, if you take a risk like that guessing the opponents tactic you should at least have a back up tactic to use on the second half if you are tied or losing at a certain minute that you decide to choose.
That is my thought on your game.
At the 81th minute you got a very good chance that could have been a goal.
Then your first goal came with the first great passing shot through the defense in the entire game. That was a great goal.
And your 2nd goal was the weirdest of all... but a goal non the less.
Personally, though I cant fully commit to the ME not having something to do with this because we dont know.
Your tactic was a bad chosen one. You took a chance at thinking that the opponent would play with their defense way up high like yours and you had your strikers very low on the pitch. THAT alone eliminated a very good chance of scoring. I would expect for a high level goalie at his highest form to be able to catch most if not all of those far away shots.
Next time, if you take a risk like that guessing the opponents tactic you should at least have a back up tactic to use on the second half if you are tied or losing at a certain minute that you decide to choose.
That is my thought on your game.
ok, i see... thank you for the reply.
Anyway, there were some ~ 4 or maybe even more 1v1 chances for me... and only one goal... That's why I'm upset...
Long shots aren't bad in the new ME... i like them...
No luck for me in this game... also I agree that my strikers were a little low and a little high in some cases. :)
Anyway, there were some ~ 4 or maybe even more 1v1 chances for me... and only one goal... That's why I'm upset...
Long shots aren't bad in the new ME... i like them...
No luck for me in this game... also I agree that my strikers were a little low and a little high in some cases. :)
Thanks for understanding.
And again... there might have been an ME issue there too... its hard to determine if it was ME error or a tactic flaw in this case. Im sure the ME needs more tuning still and that other teams will show up with some clear problems.
But in this case. I do think you chose a bad tactic and that you had some bad luck as well.
And again... there might have been an ME issue there too... its hard to determine if it was ME error or a tactic flaw in this case. Im sure the ME needs more tuning still and that other teams will show up with some clear problems.
But in this case. I do think you chose a bad tactic and that you had some bad luck as well.