Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »news Match Engine Changes
If you want you can always put negative things here ;)
Not really - the devs don't offer me all the time a reason for complaining ;)
Good luck!
Thanks, same to you!
Not really - the devs don't offer me all the time a reason for complaining ;)
Good luck!
Thanks, same to you!
Not evrybody training Def or Att etc... so sometimes changes is unfair.
I guessed my opponent tactics right. As you can see when the ball is in the middle, my two strikers are perfectly placed in the wide gaps between his central defenders and the wingbacks.
Maybe you should have put both ATTs next to eachother on 1 DEF so the DEFs of your oppontent couldn't defend both your ATTs at the same time. Make use of the new ME if you know this auto-defense and the tactic of your opponent. And don't use the old ME as an example, it's gone and won't come back :)
It is kinda dumb if you know everything but haven't used it to your advantage, something you did with the old ME but apparently not with the new ME ;) Why not, if I may ask?
(edited)
Maybe you should have put both ATTs next to eachother on 1 DEF so the DEFs of your oppontent couldn't defend both your ATTs at the same time. Make use of the new ME if you know this auto-defense and the tactic of your opponent. And don't use the old ME as an example, it's gone and won't come back :)
It is kinda dumb if you know everything but haven't used it to your advantage, something you did with the old ME but apparently not with the new ME ;) Why not, if I may ask?
(edited)
Again there are a lot of changes in the engine. When official news will be released!!!
You know what i mean you have access to the admin forum
I don't know what you mean. I do know the changes ofcourse, but I don't know what you mean with your post :)
Again there are a lot of changes in the engine.
Wrong.
sviktorov » Charles Hill
You know what i mean you have access to the admin forum
Wrong to.Charles is not an admin, he sure not have acces to the admin forum.We have other official forum(L-forum), one for all:linguists+promoters and all other officials, but we dont have access to the admin forum.
Wrong.
sviktorov » Charles Hill
You know what i mean you have access to the admin forum
Wrong to.Charles is not an admin, he sure not have acces to the admin forum.We have other official forum(L-forum), one for all:linguists+promoters and all other officials, but we dont have access to the admin forum.
if you dont have acces to the admin forum, what makes you so sure, there haven´t been new changes?
Because the ME changes are their topic on our Linguist forum.
Of curse I have thought of that :)
But how do you think my left side midfielder will behave if both strikers are placed in the right side, and the opponent playes with an offensive defense and 3-4 midfielders? He will either toss the ball backwards or sideways (but only if he is lucky enough to get a line of sight to a co-mid), or maybe just hesitate enough to get himself tackled. But certainly not forward as there is no one there. So if I want both left and right side midfielders of mine to have opportunities forward, I actually have to play with 4 strikers? 5 might be even better. Then I would call my tactics for "CoverThis" ;)
Joking aside, it shouldn't be absolutely nessesarry to place 2 or 3 strikers next to each other - just to confuse the engine. When do strikers have such twin run-patterns irl for 90 min? And if this is "the way", it also means the death of 1 striker tactics. And that I don't like. I rarely played with only 1 striker, but I would certainly like to have the opportunity for the sake of surprising my opponents now and then.
(edited)
But how do you think my left side midfielder will behave if both strikers are placed in the right side, and the opponent playes with an offensive defense and 3-4 midfielders? He will either toss the ball backwards or sideways (but only if he is lucky enough to get a line of sight to a co-mid), or maybe just hesitate enough to get himself tackled. But certainly not forward as there is no one there. So if I want both left and right side midfielders of mine to have opportunities forward, I actually have to play with 4 strikers? 5 might be even better. Then I would call my tactics for "CoverThis" ;)
Joking aside, it shouldn't be absolutely nessesarry to place 2 or 3 strikers next to each other - just to confuse the engine. When do strikers have such twin run-patterns irl for 90 min? And if this is "the way", it also means the death of 1 striker tactics. And that I don't like. I rarely played with only 1 striker, but I would certainly like to have the opportunity for the sake of surprising my opponents now and then.
(edited)
Finally took it upon myself to create a small bug report. Many of the following may just be rejected by some people as " you were just unlucky with the dices", but that is why I chosed to highligt mostly actions implicating legendary level players, such as Yarburg. Such a player should be of the more reliable sort. Some of the points may also be "older" bugs, but they still need attention.
--------------------------------------
Match: matchlink
4' : Throw-in. Yarburg on the wing position (divine passing/unearthly playmaker) who received the ball fails to do a simple pass a few meters back to the player that performed the throw-in. The ball goes over the sideline.
10' : After having dropped his wingback opponent, Yarburg has a highway of free space to run to the end line. But he doesn't. Instead he sees it (unearthly playmaker?) more fit to pass the ball to the two strikers in the center that are facing 3 defender 5 m ahead.
13' : Yarburg (wing) receives the ball after throw-in. He stands on the sideline and the nearest enemy defender is positioned 3 spaces left of him. But does he take advantage of the free space ahead? Nooo... Instead he naturally passes backwards to the thrower.
13' : Ticac tackles the ball but instead of passing it forward to the freely positioned striker right ahead, he passes it backwards to the even more free wingback...
21' Yarburg (divine/superdivine tecnique) launches the ball forward - over the sideline...
26' Again. Yarburg on the wing with a shitload of free space in front of him, decides (unearthly playmaker?) that its much better to cross the ball in the air to the strikers (which are covered) BEFORE they enter the penalty area, instead of doing the stupid thing: continue the run to the end line and THEN make the cross once the strikers are in place.
29' : Again: Throw-in. Yarburg on the wing position (divine passing/unearthly playmaker) who received the ball fails to do a simple pass a few meters back to the player that performed the throw-in. The ball goes over the sideline.
40' : Yarburg decides to see if he can outrun the ball being passed to him diagonally from the other side of the field - thereby allowing an opponent player to walk in between.
42' : Yarburg is just in front of the wingback, but instead of continuing his run, he (again) crosses the ball towards the center of the field to the two strikers which (again) are outside the penalty area and faces 3 defenders 5 m ahead.
47' : Again. Yarburg on the wing with no defender directly in front of him decides (unearthly playmaker?) that the better choice is to pass it back to the wingback.
49' : Exact replication of the situation in 26'.
55' : Again Yarburg on the wing, passing the ball to the center of the field to (to strikers that are covered) when he has no opponents in front of him.
58' : Why not do it again. (Replication of 55').
62' : And yes... one more time. (Replication of 55')
66' : Again. Yarburg (wing) receives the ball after throw-in. He stands on the sideline and the nearest enemy defender is positioned 3 spaces left of him. But does he take advantage of the free space ahead? Nooo... Instead he naturally passes backwards to the thrower.
66' Humble, having received the ball centrally in the penalty area, sees it more fit to pass the ball back?!? instead of taking the shot.
72' Humble reveives the ball on the 11m spot in the opponent penalty area and hesitates long enough to get himself tackled.
75' Again Yarburg on the wing thinks its time to replicate the situation in 55'.
78' Yarburg (divine/superdivine tecnique) again launches the ball forward - over the sideline...
85' Yarburg (once again) thinks its time to prove a point and replicates the situation of 55'.
86' And yes, why not do it one more time - just to let it sink in.
89' But wait, maybe someone did not notice, so hell lets do it again.
--------------------------------------
Then I did not include the oddities in my opponents play, and there were indeed some.
(edited)
--------------------------------------
Match: matchlink
4' : Throw-in. Yarburg on the wing position (divine passing/unearthly playmaker) who received the ball fails to do a simple pass a few meters back to the player that performed the throw-in. The ball goes over the sideline.
10' : After having dropped his wingback opponent, Yarburg has a highway of free space to run to the end line. But he doesn't. Instead he sees it (unearthly playmaker?) more fit to pass the ball to the two strikers in the center that are facing 3 defender 5 m ahead.
13' : Yarburg (wing) receives the ball after throw-in. He stands on the sideline and the nearest enemy defender is positioned 3 spaces left of him. But does he take advantage of the free space ahead? Nooo... Instead he naturally passes backwards to the thrower.
13' : Ticac tackles the ball but instead of passing it forward to the freely positioned striker right ahead, he passes it backwards to the even more free wingback...
21' Yarburg (divine/superdivine tecnique) launches the ball forward - over the sideline...
26' Again. Yarburg on the wing with a shitload of free space in front of him, decides (unearthly playmaker?) that its much better to cross the ball in the air to the strikers (which are covered) BEFORE they enter the penalty area, instead of doing the stupid thing: continue the run to the end line and THEN make the cross once the strikers are in place.
29' : Again: Throw-in. Yarburg on the wing position (divine passing/unearthly playmaker) who received the ball fails to do a simple pass a few meters back to the player that performed the throw-in. The ball goes over the sideline.
40' : Yarburg decides to see if he can outrun the ball being passed to him diagonally from the other side of the field - thereby allowing an opponent player to walk in between.
42' : Yarburg is just in front of the wingback, but instead of continuing his run, he (again) crosses the ball towards the center of the field to the two strikers which (again) are outside the penalty area and faces 3 defenders 5 m ahead.
47' : Again. Yarburg on the wing with no defender directly in front of him decides (unearthly playmaker?) that the better choice is to pass it back to the wingback.
49' : Exact replication of the situation in 26'.
55' : Again Yarburg on the wing, passing the ball to the center of the field to (to strikers that are covered) when he has no opponents in front of him.
58' : Why not do it again. (Replication of 55').
62' : And yes... one more time. (Replication of 55')
66' : Again. Yarburg (wing) receives the ball after throw-in. He stands on the sideline and the nearest enemy defender is positioned 3 spaces left of him. But does he take advantage of the free space ahead? Nooo... Instead he naturally passes backwards to the thrower.
66' Humble, having received the ball centrally in the penalty area, sees it more fit to pass the ball back?!? instead of taking the shot.
72' Humble reveives the ball on the 11m spot in the opponent penalty area and hesitates long enough to get himself tackled.
75' Again Yarburg on the wing thinks its time to replicate the situation in 55'.
78' Yarburg (divine/superdivine tecnique) again launches the ball forward - over the sideline...
85' Yarburg (once again) thinks its time to prove a point and replicates the situation of 55'.
86' And yes, why not do it one more time - just to let it sink in.
89' But wait, maybe someone did not notice, so hell lets do it again.
--------------------------------------
Then I did not include the oddities in my opponents play, and there were indeed some.
(edited)
exactly my thoughts :)
But from my experience, winger with incredible PM is acting much "smarter" then one with divine PM.
But from my experience, winger with incredible PM is acting much "smarter" then one with divine PM.
So, I should remove Yaburg from the first 11 for tomorrow?:(
sure. And Srbija should bring Ćulibrk in but none of those is going to happen so You still have a minor chance for a win. ;)