Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: »news Match Engine Changes

2009-12-08 17:16:27
What do you think when that attacker beats him at first, no he has a change to get him back by getting his maximum pace quicker then when he was tall.
(edited)
2009-12-08 17:19:45
haha, just imagine one short guy with outstanding speed and formidable stamina racing with a tall guy with divine pace and tragic stamina.

as a race starts the small guy accelerates faster and gets in front, but then the tall guy gets to his full speed, cathes up a midget and overtakes him, but by the end of the race he gets tired and a midget wins :D
2009-12-08 17:21:09
LOL I like it allready :D
2009-12-08 17:58:26
yep and btw the tall one jumps over the short one and scores a goal =))
2009-12-08 18:03:24
own goal, because hes got no coordination
2009-12-08 18:03:32
in real life a football professional player minimum height is 153 I think

146 cm is not real...
2009-12-08 18:11:32
That almost every player can be divine if he trains long enough neither...
2009-12-08 18:32:43
Ture. It doesn't matter if lowest height is called 146 or 182. It could be called "tragic height, divine height", etc. Or "72% agile, 28% air play", and so on. "Realistic" doesn't mean much in a context where the only role of height is to set a point in a jumping vs acceleration trade-off. And as long as the differences between accelerations and aerial abilities are realistic, the feature is realistic. So, it can be unrealistic even if minimum is 175 and maximum is 185, if differences in the field are ridiculous.

In brief: we are discussing names here, which is pointless. The feature itself can only be analyzed after tomorrow's matches.
2009-12-08 18:42:08
In the future, will we be able to train their heights??? :Z
update ftw...
2009-12-08 19:18:50
oh yes, break their legs and stretch them out :)
2009-12-08 20:28:46
or cut them, so they run faster
2009-12-08 21:05:50
Just a thought about defenders: Many forgets that a prerequisite for winning a header is being at the right spot. Since you cannot cover all possible positions in your own penalty box, a short defender must be at an advantage here as he can react to a misplacement much quicker than a tall one. He might have less than 50% chance of winning the header, but at least he has a chance compared to the tall and slow defender which will never get to where the ball is aimed - giving a free header to the striker :)

Of course if you know how your opponent will place his strikers, then taller is better (for headers). But against serious opposition you rarely do.
2009-12-08 21:19:16
agree, and if you can neutralize oponents wingers with your fullbacks then I´d say it is even more useful to have shorter defenders, which would mean that there won´t be much header situations and it will also reduces the amount of throughballs won by oponent as defs have better acceleration. Shorter defenceline could also help to create more offsides.
2009-12-08 21:43:45
what about the 0 cm players???
2009-12-08 21:44:17
players with special skill - invisibility
2009-12-08 21:48:35
mole-players :P