Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »news Match Engine Changes
USA U21 vs Italy U21: A penalty renamed Mozzarella Penalty kick.
:-)
IMHO motor engine should be modified, onestly I preferred the last sunday one, but Greg will have an idea and he will get it.
:-)
IMHO motor engine should be modified, onestly I preferred the last sunday one, but Greg will have an idea and he will get it.
I really like the new ME. First of: IRL results, no more 5-4, 8-2 etc... Was happy to see even a 0-0 (Italy-France).
Maybe in your match you had bad luck, I had 6 shots-2 goals, 1 from a midfielder... The new ME is good, you just have to adapt to it.
Maybe in your match you had bad luck, I had 6 shots-2 goals, 1 from a midfielder... The new ME is good, you just have to adapt to it.
it need a speed up, and cleaning on the pitch, after that it will be all right.
IT got a speed boost already. But what I really want is to have at NT top pitch. In our match I say a long pass going a bizzare way at the end... changed directions unexpected.
(edited)
(edited)
No. It is not.
Striking is bad, really sucks.
Attackers' movements = bad. No more dribbling. Players IQ has fallen.
defenders pass too far to attackers ignoring free mids.
the ball still bounces 7 times on a crossbar... no comment.
abuse of lobs in every situation.
condition of the field for NT matches are horrible.
headstrikes too weak when to score and too strong when to pass and another 20 issues u will find in the previous posts.
the ball still bounces 7 times on a crossbar... no comment.
You lost in the final against Spain due to a defender passing to GK which ended up as an own goal. And you people were satisfied with that old ME...
Stuff like that (bouncing on crossbar) happened since the dawn of sokker.
(edited)
You lost in the final against Spain due to a defender passing to GK which ended up as an own goal. And you people were satisfied with that old ME...
Stuff like that (bouncing on crossbar) happened since the dawn of sokker.
(edited)
And you people were satisfied with that old ME
never said that. And if something unbelievable (7 bounce on a bar) happens since "the dawn" for me is a reason more not a reason less to chage it.
if we say it's all good there will be no bottom-up improvements.
to be intolerant to criticism is not smart.
Striking is bad, really sucks.
Attackers' movements = bad. No more dribbling. Players IQ has fallen.
defenders pass too far to attackers ignoring free mids.
the ball still bounces 7 times on a crossbar... no comment.
abuse of lobs in every situation.
condition of the field for NT matches are horrible.
headstrikes too weak when to score and too strong when to pass and another 20 issues u will find in the previous posts.
i`m thinking at playing the next match with a 3x14 striker..i`m sure he will do bettern than a 3xdivine
Attackers' movements = bad. No more dribbling. Players IQ has fallen.
defenders pass too far to attackers ignoring free mids.
the ball still bounces 7 times on a crossbar... no comment.
abuse of lobs in every situation.
condition of the field for NT matches are horrible.
headstrikes too weak when to score and too strong when to pass and another 20 issues u will find in the previous posts.
i`m thinking at playing the next match with a 3x14 striker..i`m sure he will do bettern than a 3xdivine
You lost in the final against Spain due to a defender passing to GK which ended up as an own goald. And you people were satisfied with that old ME...
that is older than last one!
we really like sunday's ME! it was perfect, and it wasn't the same of the final spain-italy!
that is older than last one!
we really like sunday's ME! it was perfect, and it wasn't the same of the final spain-italy!
No, only to new things that sucks,
the new things tested, professionally introduced and communicated to the users are more than welcome, that's not the case of course...
the new things tested, professionally introduced and communicated to the users are more than welcome, that's not the case of course...
if we say it's all good there will be no bottom-up improvements.
which part of this sentence is not clear?
which part of this sentence is not clear?
You're also intolerant to new things...
And I think that with this provoking (and also quite insulting) phrase of yours (which maybe could also be attributed to Goebbels in the 1930s), you are disqualifying yourself as somebody to take into consideration in any serious discussion.
Could you, for a chance, illuminate us, and offer a full and detailed comparision list, with objective data, with the 'new things' that, in your opinion, currently enhance the game and make it better than the 'old things', and which can supportu your point of view so overhelmingly that we should agree that everyone discrepant with your opinions is wrong?
Or do you think the 'advantages' are so evident that everyone should see it, and that all of us who don't share you 'wisdom' and see the things in another way (and point them out, with explanations and examples) are blind, or simply stupid?
And I think that with this provoking (and also quite insulting) phrase of yours (which maybe could also be attributed to Goebbels in the 1930s), you are disqualifying yourself as somebody to take into consideration in any serious discussion.
Could you, for a chance, illuminate us, and offer a full and detailed comparision list, with objective data, with the 'new things' that, in your opinion, currently enhance the game and make it better than the 'old things', and which can supportu your point of view so overhelmingly that we should agree that everyone discrepant with your opinions is wrong?
Or do you think the 'advantages' are so evident that everyone should see it, and that all of us who don't share you 'wisdom' and see the things in another way (and point them out, with explanations and examples) are blind, or simply stupid?