Subject: »news Match Engine Changes

I beg to differ. It is more balanced.

P.S. Want to add more to my previous post. You say it's random, I say more adequate. The ME just takes into account more factors, and calculates more accurately. Just not being used to it, you consider it random.
(edited)

Yeah it is random, players who score penalties are horrible, and the ones that should score don't even hit the goal.

Robben, Kaka, Ronaldo, they are the one who should score. They didn't in Champions League ;) Think about this...

You gotta be kidding me, it's okay that you support the changes, that you love the ME and everything I don't have any problem with that but you fail at trying to convince anyone if you say that 1 penaltie scored out of 10 is normal.

it is normal, when a match lasts 20 minutes (normal match 90 min) you have more chances to change result of the match. And one of 10 penalties isnt sokker´s case ;) maybe 1 of 3 penalties is scored...

I'm not trying to persuade you.( first of)

Secondly: There are your messages:

Right now the ME is just too random.

Yeah it is random, players who score penalties are horrible, and the ones that should score don't even hit the goal.


From what you've said, I gave you a normal reply. Now from nowhere you give me this strange statistic: 1/10 penalties are scored. Who made this statistic? What players were involved? How many shots were studied?! I bet you just said that, so you would look cocky.



P.S. I want to remember you what once greg said(not a quote): Now when strikers shoot, or go 1on1 against a goalkeeper, on the shooting moment, in the calculation will be included player's striking and GK's keeping skill. So logically, a Divine striking forward won't have the edge against a GK with Superdivine keeping. I mean the GK has a small edge here, nothing more. This doesn't mean that GK will always stop the shot.

Sorry I don't quite understand what you said.

Are you saying that in Sokker 1 out of 3 penalties is scored? even that doesn't look normal to me.

what is more balanced?
this is not real this is sokker... teamA average players, teamB great players..... score 1:0 instead of 0:5, thats what new ME brings to sokker, totally bullsh......t

another thing, I know visualisation is not a thing we should judge sokker but come on, divine strikers are not shooting, they are passing to goalkeeper, same with penaltilies:"(

beta sokker came to us, pitty it is during the season

teamA average players, teamB great players..... score 1:0 instead of 0:5,

Please show me this match.

I bet you just said that, so you would look cocky.

You always act like if you were talking with stupid people.

http://online.sokker.org/comment.php?matchID=20136788

Count the penalties please.

CC teams, top players and 1 penalty scored.

Wait a second, you use 1 match report as a full game statistics?! In order to make a research you need to make a whole f*cking study. And by the fact you used this specific match as a generalization on penalties, yes I have to agree on this one:

You always act like if you were talking with stupid people.

Who talked about a study? dude chill, you are going nuts.

I just pointed out that 1 penalty scored out of 10 is insane.

all hes saying is you should never come to conclusions based on a single set of info...

I don't have any problem with that but you fail at trying to convince anyone if you say that 1 penaltie scored out of 10 is normal.



This sentence looks like you are talking about a study. Either try to express your thought more coherently or face these consequences( by that I mean misunderstanding).

Also Ruyshi, pointed out what I meant.

Yeah, right.

But here there are four or five people who are trying to say that it was too difficult to score, statistical panels apart. An impressive number of cup matches ended to penalty (16 to score 3 goals in my case).
This is the main stream impression, not his. So if he wants to discuss on a math basis he has to make the study not all the others.