Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »news Match Engine Changes
yes, but dont know how the ME working, because all the players were that slow i slept on the match.
My defender step about 10-12 while moved about 5-6 meters. Now i understand why cant reach your striker:)
My defender step about 10-12 while moved about 5-6 meters. Now i understand why cant reach your striker:)
Well in the news was written that the pace got higher(from the last change), but the acceleration slower. And that's why my strikers were hardly starting to go on a break through against your defenders :)
Its funny, you are literally owning everybody who vows to argue :]
I just want people to think before they post, or express a negative/positive feeling towards a specific issue.
honest and humble opinion
you can like or dislike new me the way it was introduced was wrong
so everyone is arguing on nothing .... wich me are you talking about ?
tomorrow will be the 3rd version in 3 weeks
you can like or dislike new me the way it was introduced was wrong
so everyone is arguing on nothing .... wich me are you talking about ?
tomorrow will be the 3rd version in 3 weeks
okey, you won the match, congrats, but if you say it wasn't a nonsense game(details above), then what are we talking about?
I get that the new ME gives more realistic score lines, and that would be fine if the reason for it was more passing back (actually GOOD passing back) but the reason the scores are closer is because all the players have 50 pound weights attached to their ankles and it is painful to watch.
I don't mind a ME that makes games closer but I do mind when the players are so slow you have to wait at least 10 seconds after every pass for someone to reach the ball.
I don't mind a ME that makes games closer but I do mind when the players are so slow you have to wait at least 10 seconds after every pass for someone to reach the ball.
I agree with you that people shouldn't blame the sokker as a whole as it's not a constructive criticism.
BUT we have to take into account the unprofessional manner of the latest improvements introduction, the customers are entitled to be very dissatisfied, their reaction cannot be just labeled as being "cocky", it's quite a justified customer reaction overall.
Secondly, it's very wrong to justify the last improvements saying that they bring sokker closer to the real football. It's not true. We have lower scores as it use to be in the reality but it isn't made because we have more football elements (except the improved passing but not totally), sokker devs just have cut the likelihood of scoring but the "means on the pitch" of getting those scores weren't improved (got closer to the real football).
I don't have time for explanations but your cousin surely could do it if he would look at the sokker matches.
If I know just about 7-10 matches with 1-3 goals scored from 10 penalty shots or sometimes quite worse, and all these matches were played in the same day, I don't need an entire statistics, I'm able to say that is something wrong. If I saw a freekick with the player shooting the ball up high in the air and running to it right away and hitting it again without to be touched by other player....well, no need to see more for a conclusion.
Okay, they said it will be fixed but till then they deserve a little criticism for their amateurish job.
I just wanted to outline these, no time for more.
(edited)
BUT we have to take into account the unprofessional manner of the latest improvements introduction, the customers are entitled to be very dissatisfied, their reaction cannot be just labeled as being "cocky", it's quite a justified customer reaction overall.
Secondly, it's very wrong to justify the last improvements saying that they bring sokker closer to the real football. It's not true. We have lower scores as it use to be in the reality but it isn't made because we have more football elements (except the improved passing but not totally), sokker devs just have cut the likelihood of scoring but the "means on the pitch" of getting those scores weren't improved (got closer to the real football).
I don't have time for explanations but your cousin surely could do it if he would look at the sokker matches.
If I know just about 7-10 matches with 1-3 goals scored from 10 penalty shots or sometimes quite worse, and all these matches were played in the same day, I don't need an entire statistics, I'm able to say that is something wrong. If I saw a freekick with the player shooting the ball up high in the air and running to it right away and hitting it again without to be touched by other player....well, no need to see more for a conclusion.
Okay, they said it will be fixed but till then they deserve a little criticism for their amateurish job.
I just wanted to outline these, no time for more.
(edited)
Tnx for taking the time to precisely explain my thought. :)
I humbly add that I, and a lot of other users I know in italian community, would by far prefer to see restored sunday ME respect to another risky and unsufficienlty tested new ME introduction.
That's all. I don't think we are all to blame as we were heretic or "ungrateful" for this, we want improvements too but lets give time to time... and to test, please.
PS
The most absurd freekick of Sokker history, the one you reported, is mine (78' last cup match)
When I saw it I was like...
(edited)
I humbly add that I, and a lot of other users I know in italian community, would by far prefer to see restored sunday ME respect to another risky and unsufficienlty tested new ME introduction.
That's all. I don't think we are all to blame as we were heretic or "ungrateful" for this, we want improvements too but lets give time to time... and to test, please.
PS
The most absurd freekick of Sokker history, the one you reported, is mine (78' last cup match)
When I saw it I was like...
(edited)
Just saw few matches. Today's ME seems fine. Players and ball are faster, shooting and passing power has been increased.
Also saw a penalty and it was taken very lame
Also saw a penalty and it was taken very lame
Just saw few matches. Today's ME seems fine. Players and ball are faster, shooting and passing power has been increased.
That's why I was arguing yesterday! I saw the NT matches with this new upgrade, and it is a good one!
That's why I was arguing yesterday! I saw the NT matches with this new upgrade, and it is a good one!
analyze how REAL TEAMS PLAY, analyze their tactics, or better GET A FOOTBALL BOOK and educate yourself about football.
but you don't think managers in sokker will be better to create tactics??...lol!!:))
but you don't think managers in sokker will be better to create tactics??...lol!!:))
In IRL you say: Wow, this is what you call teamwork, determination and ambition. But if this happens in Sokker, what is the reaction?!
ICE-T you write a lot, but sometimes your thoughts look pretty dumb to me sorry.
Because in real life there IS teamwork, in Sokker you can only set up your own world.
I hope you know that football is an unpredictable game, that's why we have always new champions, interesting matches, because you can't always predict how the game ends. If you could predict it 100%, it would become boring and with no sense in it.
This is true but the old engine here let better tactics and better teams win...but there was place for big surprises. Now with the new engine it is way more difficult to dominate a match because there are fewer goals. And with defenders moving towards strikers there is one possibilitiy lost to create a good tactic by placing players well (for example attackers).
weak tactic, ends in a weak result.
Especially with the old engine...now a bad tactic is getting better, but it still can be bad...but it differs not that much as before.
ICE-T you write a lot, but sometimes your thoughts look pretty dumb to me sorry.
Because in real life there IS teamwork, in Sokker you can only set up your own world.
I hope you know that football is an unpredictable game, that's why we have always new champions, interesting matches, because you can't always predict how the game ends. If you could predict it 100%, it would become boring and with no sense in it.
This is true but the old engine here let better tactics and better teams win...but there was place for big surprises. Now with the new engine it is way more difficult to dominate a match because there are fewer goals. And with defenders moving towards strikers there is one possibilitiy lost to create a good tactic by placing players well (for example attackers).
weak tactic, ends in a weak result.
Especially with the old engine...now a bad tactic is getting better, but it still can be bad...but it differs not that much as before.
I wouldn't agree on last one. Bad tactics will always be bad.
This is true:) But for example if there is a wing and a manager didn't place a defender there, so a "weaker" tactic is better because a defender runs to take the winger out of the game.
I think a normal tactic (not a brilliant and not a crappy one) can lead to sucess more easily now...
...i gotta mention that i agree with a lot of the postings of Ice-T...the last posting was a little bit rough, but he will take it right i know:)
I think a normal tactic (not a brilliant and not a crappy one) can lead to sucess more easily now...
...i gotta mention that i agree with a lot of the postings of Ice-T...the last posting was a little bit rough, but he will take it right i know:)