Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [news] Junior Teams
well, it has a bad effect, no bonus training for these players...
Is there going to be any limitation about using juniors who have ended their school period and are not added to the first team?
Because id not, then an expoit exists here: we could seein some season "professional junors" of ages 23, 24, etc, which rich teams could happily maintain to stay in the top leagues. They could take the option of leaving there forever there excellent-formidable (and such) juniors which could be scoring good ratings in the junior matches but who could not serve them nor give them good revenues if sold (for instance, their real profits could be intended towards incredible or higher juniors). This politic could not be matched by more modest teams, as an excellent junior could be for them a crack badly needed for their temas (or to get some needed income to maintain their economics).
Also, and in the end, there can't be any logic in such a thing allowed to happen: aside from the fairness, whre is the logic in allowing a junior to stay indefinitely in school, without training and ocuppying space? It was on purpose, waiting for this (the introduction of junior teams) to arrive some day?
Maybe it's already time of introducing the "automatic exiting from school (joining the first team) feature"?...
Because id not, then an expoit exists here: we could seein some season "professional junors" of ages 23, 24, etc, which rich teams could happily maintain to stay in the top leagues. They could take the option of leaving there forever there excellent-formidable (and such) juniors which could be scoring good ratings in the junior matches but who could not serve them nor give them good revenues if sold (for instance, their real profits could be intended towards incredible or higher juniors). This politic could not be matched by more modest teams, as an excellent junior could be for them a crack badly needed for their temas (or to get some needed income to maintain their economics).
Also, and in the end, there can't be any logic in such a thing allowed to happen: aside from the fairness, whre is the logic in allowing a junior to stay indefinitely in school, without training and ocuppying space? It was on purpose, waiting for this (the introduction of junior teams) to arrive some day?
Maybe it's already time of introducing the "automatic exiting from school (joining the first team) feature"?...
Maybe it's already time of introducing the "automatic exiting from school (joining the first team) feature"?...
Only at the end of a season though.
Only at the end of a season though.
One idea : I think we should not be allowed to choose for a match juniors with "0 weeks" remaining in their junior school. Maybe devs could add this limitation ?
well, it has a bad effect, no bonus training for these players...
You don't know it. It's only your supposition...
(edited)
it would be silly to do this, they do not train, they use up a spot and some money every week, and there is no real advantage to being in the first of bottom division with Jr. school, it is kind of meaningless, unless winning by using such unsportsmanlike ways is actually satisfying to you, because it would be pretty obvious to everyone what you are doing
as well, you don't even get the actual player, so what level are you going to draw the line at, very good, excellent, formidable? starting to get up into wasted money/talents for a hollow victory
I am pretty sure this won't be an issue
as well, you don't even get the actual player, so what level are you going to draw the line at, very good, excellent, formidable? starting to get up into wasted money/talents for a hollow victory
I am pretty sure this won't be an issue
remember the junior results has a slight effect on fan moral
mate, I was talking about NT players, when a national team plays with more than 5 defs,5 mids or 3 atts, then these players don't get the 50% bonus...
about junior teams, d'oh, I'm not dumb :P
about junior teams, d'oh, I'm not dumb :P
sry, was obviously replying to tiolucas, just hit the wrong reply button :)
One idea : I think we should not be allowed to choose for a match juniors with "0 weeks" remaining in their junior school. Maybe devs could add this limitation ?
This wouldn't be a good thing to do.
Remember that you can't buy youth players for your squad but you need 11 players to play.
I currently have 12 players in my youth school, 2 of them are keepers.
Next week I pull one of them and get only 1 tragic on saturday?
This happened to me last week and I have to use the tragic one now today to field a team.
A good manager would have kept that one from last week till saturday to see if something usefull joins the school.
This is a learning factor and should stay like that.
(edited)
This wouldn't be a good thing to do.
Remember that you can't buy youth players for your squad but you need 11 players to play.
I currently have 12 players in my youth school, 2 of them are keepers.
Next week I pull one of them and get only 1 tragic on saturday?
This happened to me last week and I have to use the tragic one now today to field a team.
A good manager would have kept that one from last week till saturday to see if something usefull joins the school.
This is a learning factor and should stay like that.
(edited)
Another idea: we should be allowed to play in juniors also with less than 11 players, as in a normal game where you can play with 10 or 9? I remember that the match is lost by forfait if less than 10 or 9 players, no?
Shouldn't be the same in juniors matches?
Shouldn't be the same in juniors matches?
Walkovers from junior matches happen :(
I would like to see new walkover rules apply to junior matches
I would like to see new walkover rules apply to junior matches