Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT]World Cup Qualifiers
Look our game yesterday..It was almost a lie...
2 offsaids goal for Polska..and i think..we played very good.4 clasical chances for goal..for us and bugs to my orders and i did not play with our fast...superdivine keeper,,,but with the slow..keeper..And one goal because of slow reaction of him.That game was like a win with Kypros..I dont understand..why 2 bug goals from clear offside position..?You can look the game..
2 offsaids goal for Polska..and i think..we played very good.4 clasical chances for goal..for us and bugs to my orders and i did not play with our fast...superdivine keeper,,,but with the slow..keeper..And one goal because of slow reaction of him.That game was like a win with Kypros..I dont understand..why 2 bug goals from clear offside position..?You can look the game..
There is no such things as bug goal in sokker, it's about time to accept it.
it's animation bugs dude.. not engine :) and how your striker dribbled our defenders? I don't know.. our striker losed ball but your striker dribbled almost our all defenders;>
have you seen polish third substititution? :PP
a lie because Kypros lost match against Polska :D sorry maybe i drunk so much.. but i don't know what to do now.. laugh on my chair or laugh on the floor?:D
your 4 situations.. and our 20.. this stupid engine helped Poland!:D
have you seen polish third substititution? :PP
a lie because Kypros lost match against Polska :D sorry maybe i drunk so much.. but i don't know what to do now.. laugh on my chair or laugh on the floor?:D
your 4 situations.. and our 20.. this stupid engine helped Poland!:D
players are never offside if it's not called. If it looks like they are it is an animation bug not a match engine bug
What are the goals that were prevented? I took a peek in the goals, and I thought the first two dubious means even more this happens, your advocate is someone who is giving condition '
your advocate is someone who is giving condition??
Guatemala is one of the most luckiest NT's in the game.. or is it you who have it as they are always in your group and helping you out with their 3 from 3 in this game and 1 from 1 against France (while France had 0 from 20) in the last WCQ....
:-O
:-O
Guatemala is one of the most luckiest NT's in the game..
+1!
+1!
There is (or was) some kind of offside bug though, when a player launched the ball and another one standing offside picked it up, no offside was given. But perhaps that has been fixed.
fortunate that?
are 11 to 11, unless the developers of Sokker likes the flag of Guatemala and help us :P
Fortunately that is easier to see growth :D
if we talk about luck I must say that Guatemala has a lot to have so many high level gk that if we are lucky
(edited)
are 11 to 11, unless the developers of Sokker likes the flag of Guatemala and help us :P
Fortunately that is easier to see growth :D
if we talk about luck I must say that Guatemala has a lot to have so many high level gk that if we are lucky
(edited)
I wish we had 0.01% luck as you guys have... i would happily trade the luck with you and let everyone say we are lucky as well, no problem with that for me...
;-)
;-)
animation bug..?
HAHAAHAH!... i MUST LaUGH!I have put the tactic on that piece of the field in order to put out offside the players of Poland.This not happenes in other games until the time i am on that game that called sokker.So it is not an animation BUG BUT A REAL BUG.
it's animation bugs dude.. not engine :) and how your striker dribbled our defenders? I don't know.. our striker losed ball but your striker dribbled almost our all defenders;>
Its all matter of how you put the players on the field and how you have the tactic in diffirence with opponent,,,
have you seen polish third substititution? :PP
i Know the players..but i know mine..I play with brilliant defenders with no passing and technique and with brilliant striker with outstanding pace and unearthly technique.And i scored to you..!!And ho many shoots didnt happened because of low pace of striker,,,?They were more..
So if i had Hellas on that game i think i could have win..
a lie because Kypros lost match against Polska :D sorry maybe i drunk so much.. but i don't know what to do now.. laugh on my chair or laugh on the floor?:D
Don laugh with that...but with you..because you used 5 defenders against our team and you eat goal and you could have eat more with our classic chances,..,and with other oppopenmts much stronger you used 4 defs...THE 77 mark of you almost with our 61 ours,,,say that you must cry on the floor and on the chair and any place you want but not laugh,.,.,,
your 4 situations.. and our 20.. this stupid engine helped Poland!:D
Of course engine helpes Poland,.,.like the previous game that oppopent took a lot of red cards,,,and played without center of defence.With us also in a lot of times inside the game....;)
(edited)
HAHAAHAH!... i MUST LaUGH!I have put the tactic on that piece of the field in order to put out offside the players of Poland.This not happenes in other games until the time i am on that game that called sokker.So it is not an animation BUG BUT A REAL BUG.
it's animation bugs dude.. not engine :) and how your striker dribbled our defenders? I don't know.. our striker losed ball but your striker dribbled almost our all defenders;>
Its all matter of how you put the players on the field and how you have the tactic in diffirence with opponent,,,
have you seen polish third substititution? :PP
i Know the players..but i know mine..I play with brilliant defenders with no passing and technique and with brilliant striker with outstanding pace and unearthly technique.And i scored to you..!!And ho many shoots didnt happened because of low pace of striker,,,?They were more..
So if i had Hellas on that game i think i could have win..
a lie because Kypros lost match against Polska :D sorry maybe i drunk so much.. but i don't know what to do now.. laugh on my chair or laugh on the floor?:D
Don laugh with that...but with you..because you used 5 defenders against our team and you eat goal and you could have eat more with our classic chances,..,and with other oppopenmts much stronger you used 4 defs...THE 77 mark of you almost with our 61 ours,,,say that you must cry on the floor and on the chair and any place you want but not laugh,.,.,,
your 4 situations.. and our 20.. this stupid engine helped Poland!:D
Of course engine helpes Poland,.,.like the previous game that oppopent took a lot of red cards,,,and played without center of defence.With us also in a lot of times inside the game....;)
(edited)
It's not difficult to call offside hen it is in the engine. Programming such thing is easy.
So yes, this is an animation bug, more then it is a real bug. You are not the God of tactics. Your defenders played on offside but did'nt succeed...
So yes, this is an animation bug, more then it is a real bug. You are not the God of tactics. Your defenders played on offside but did'nt succeed...
i see an ironic speech...I bet that your national team can eat more than 5 goals..from Poland..So im not a god of tactic of course,.,but i expect to see players moving in field with just the way i put them on tactic...as every time i see them on games a lot of time know in diffirence withhe game with Poland..
Belgium could actually beat Poland with a good tactic.
@ EVLOGHTOS
if players move on the field in exactly the way you put them then the realism factor would be gone. do you really want to be able to put some player entirely out of range of the opponent for example? now that would result in a boring mechanical looking match.
so the match engine does some things with these tactics to solve the differences between them and the players used on both sides. sometimes that does give the appearance of the match engine cheating.
sure i've seen it happen in my own matches against an opponent which is supposed to be better ... suddenly that 'great' defense you have decides to leave a gap somewhere so that the 'even greater' striker can score the number of goals which the match engine calculated.
but you know what? just like in any other game when a user knows how the match engine 'cheats' and abuses this knowledge he usually calls it a 'good tactic' instead of cheating haha
but even with the best players and the best tactic there's some randomness, some 'luck' needed to get some of these results and it keeps things interesting. yes, even Poland needs some 'luck', just not as much as teams with lesser players.
(edited)
if players move on the field in exactly the way you put them then the realism factor would be gone. do you really want to be able to put some player entirely out of range of the opponent for example? now that would result in a boring mechanical looking match.
so the match engine does some things with these tactics to solve the differences between them and the players used on both sides. sometimes that does give the appearance of the match engine cheating.
sure i've seen it happen in my own matches against an opponent which is supposed to be better ... suddenly that 'great' defense you have decides to leave a gap somewhere so that the 'even greater' striker can score the number of goals which the match engine calculated.
but you know what? just like in any other game when a user knows how the match engine 'cheats' and abuses this knowledge he usually calls it a 'good tactic' instead of cheating haha
but even with the best players and the best tactic there's some randomness, some 'luck' needed to get some of these results and it keeps things interesting. yes, even Poland needs some 'luck', just not as much as teams with lesser players.
(edited)