Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: The Best Manager In Sokker

2010-11-01 00:12:11
u joined earlier than 6 people from ur first league
other 2 joined earlier but just by a little - that pretty much explain ur competetiveness
2010-11-01 00:13:36
Well that's the point, you can't compare average marks if one country is a lot bigger than the other one...bigger countries mean more competition, a more difficult way to reach the top, less income, etc....
2010-11-01 00:15:28
so u mean i even have disadvantage? because we only have 4 leagues => sponsor income is smaller and team fan base is smaller as well => less spectators
2010-11-01 00:16:13
league ratings this season. (I'll agree Cup influenced it, but even this week's stats give same result)
If you can pass to the highest league by passing through 2.02 or 2.04. Whats the harder way you think? :)
61.3 2de Klasse.04
60.9 2de Klasse.01
59.2 2de Klasse.02
58.7 Eerste Klasse

And damn this, I'm going to finish my episode of Firefly!
2010-11-01 00:18:01
it should make no difference since u have above that average and ure 'great' tactician
(edited)
2010-11-01 00:18:39
I mean you both had to face different challenges....it's hard to tell what's easier, but my impression would be that it's easier to reach the top in a smaller country, yes...I doubt I would have ever made it to a Champions Cup tournament if I had registered in Poland....
2010-11-01 00:20:05
You're getting upset about losing in a competition you've been calling pointless and ridiculous from the start?

"we r both popular in our own way"

You really aren't
2010-11-01 00:21:49
ok im not and u r
just remove me from this.
2010-11-01 00:22:20
It's getting boring, seriously.
First you act like you don't give a sh** about this 'popularity' contest and you act that way till the votes go your way.
Then when you're starting to lose, it's suddenly total BiSHi and you start to cry, fight and scratch like a pregnant cat.

Next time don't act as if you don't care so much, you won't look like a sore loser then...
(edited)
2010-11-01 00:23:07
^2
2010-11-01 00:24:47
my rating is below average most weeks. No surprise with no-stamina and young mids.
Anyway, I have to agree with the post of uamini about 'different challenges'. Also, yes, small countries are easier. As you spoke about Indonesia, I'll use that as an example. League winner has been playing since 2007-07-06. He has a rating of 56. I bet any interested and basic skilled manager can become a seasonly top3 candidate there within 8 seasons. Proof: check Hells team. It took him way less, but he is ofc way better than 'basic skilled'. But I doubt he'll reach the top level again within an extra 8 seasons and become a 'constant presence' there.

Btw, if it were about 'popularity' for most users, I guess I can get very far. But I doubt I'll survive against teams like Seca (who is - almost - a bot and hence not really popular)
(edited)
2010-11-01 00:25:07
True. Although everyone knew this was going to happen.
2010-11-01 00:25:20
when did i say that i dont care? all iu said that its voting system is ridiculous because all it represents is popularity
people onbly vote normally when both contestants are popular
and why would i say anything when i win a round that i should win?

and i didnt lose so far result was like 1 point apart
(edited)
2010-11-01 00:28:45
hells will be better than u in a season or two...
2010-11-01 00:28:56
I'd say that I'm more popular than Shadow when we taking international crowd into matter...and yet I'm losing :-)

Yeah, flawless logic this one of yours is, indeed.
2010-11-01 00:29:28
I'm gonna vote only for this one:

MacLanghe Vs Dumb

Cheer up!