Subject: Friendlies and fan mood

So you prefer to play a "safe" tactic just to avoid any injury (where an injury is a risk factor which makes Sokker more random game)? And you are saying that friendly game suppose to do not do anything to the fan mood because is not like in real life, but show me who is playing "safe" tactic in real ;)

I'm against the 'safe' tactics as well if you see may games i never played 'safe' punishing those users is not the right way to punish all teams that training fair there should be another way.

But IMO fan mood was "improved" to minimize those not realistic tactics and somehow to punish managers which are using them.

those tactics will be useless if the injuries are excluded from friendlies or reduced . I guess that there should be other way to prevent lining up near touch line .

Maybe detecting such thing could cause a mass fight between teammates and the trainer producing red cards will be solution that will be funny :)

But the other people should not be responsible for those tactics.

I understand that, but there were a lot of ideas to minimize "safe" tactics, and no one was approved by devs :\ So fan mood, IMO, left as only one way to penalize it.

too bad for the devs :(

move this to bugs ideas or close. its unecessary here.
and wont be changed anyway
its been asked a load already
IT WONT BE CHANGED. get used to it. PICK YOUR FRIENDLY OPPONENTS BETTER. K-TNKS-BYE

http://online.sokker.org/forum_topic.php?ID_forum=1261&ID_topic=2276799&pg=0#new

http://online.sokker.org/forum_topic.php?ID_forum=1259&ID_topic=1998824&pg=1

http://online.sokker.org/forum_topic.php?ID_forum=1259&ID_topic=1608612&pg=0#new
(edited)

I know it wont be changed, as I wrote above :)

If it's against "safe" tactics, I would accept the friendlies even more "penalized" like the officials ones :)))

I agree with the thread creator or at least give us the same ticket income as official games if friendlies must have such an important effect on ranking.

But he just had bad luck.

He probably got to 1.01-1 mood and the friendly got it down that small percentage.

I understand that, but there were a lot of ideas to minimize "safe" tactics, and no one was approved by devs :\ So fan mood, IMO, left as only one way to penalize it.

I don't think it works with this team ;) he doesn't care about with fan mood and others :) actually, it works for him in case he just want to raise others fan mood's and help their training sessions......
IKS Biała Tuchów

The system can be tricked if measures are not effective enough.
(edited)
(edited)

The problem is not that i had bad luck, if evrything else is calculated by the sub levels i do not care about the presentation. Problem is that i do not have cahnce to win if i train 5-6 17-18years old playes even against the teams from the lower divisions i have to search for teams like me which is waste of time .
And what about those that training speed and they need to face a team that trains goal keepers.

So before you vote just think . Leve peopel to play friendly as they want and chose their way to develop, but do not put in misary those who wants to train young players !!!!!!

Toward the creators of the game ( I know devs do not decide what is priority i'm dev too) listen what people wants and don't waste time and resourses on stupid faces and adding more bugs in the game!!

yes

ok sub levels lets assume that the drop from the friendlies was because of that today 8-0 against team with team that is just 200pt less rating then mine and again just 1 level.

This is insane they want from us wins with 20 goals? How a new team will react after loosing 2-3 games like this it makes the game unpopular .

There is much better way to do the rank you winning i a specific division with determinate result you receive your rank points . Or at least expectation to be more determinate by the current group position!!

Ranking has nothing to do with it. It's only based on fan club size.

I don't understand what you wanted to say about today's match. Did you gain a level in fan mood or did you lose one?