Subject: News - Sokker Improvements

As I see you wrote the same as I in the other topic about the 2nd tactic, so +100

Now, whine about that like the ingrates you are ;)

Looking at some of the comments in this topic, and another topic, in some cases you are right. And ofcourse I'm not surprised at all some are again whining now that thing are changed, even though not one single matches is played with these new changes ;P Probably they are allergic to changes and improvements .... :)

Great that improvements are now being made :)

Im looking foward to seeing how everybody reacts and responds to this new option , should improve the game !

I have nothing against the changes, not at all

I just see it as a big help for stronger teams

This is the same opinion that comes on every change and never turned out to be right.
When player height was added.
When tactical discipline was added.
...and so on.
And then people wonder why devs don't come with new features regulary with all those whiners around who feel like joining their "opinion" 100 times everywhere on the forums, like someone has taken their lolly.
(edited)

Then maybe make a counter argument to what I wrote earlier instead of saying 'you're wrong cause people are always wrong'

Really happy with the changes. Should make the NT more interesting, and i cant wait to try it out with my own club. Allso like the "smaller" changes.

Before I could make 5 Conditional Orders, but only 3 substitutions a match.

Now I can make 10 Conditional Orders, but how many substitutions can I make.

I would like to be able to make more substitutions each game, so I can train more of my players per match.

Also is it possible to create a 10 man tactic in the tactics editor incase one of my players gets a red card and I'm down to 10 men ?

Maybe in the next update Chief ;)

let's keep it to the real football, where only 3 subs are allowed :)

“Then maybe make a counter argument to what I wrote earlier instead of saying 'you're wrong cause people are always wrong...'”

To which statement? You contradict yourself on a regular basis regardless of topic. I always find it funny that when someone proves you wrong with a verifiable fact you resort to 5th grade school yard name-calling. We could probably start a money pool on each new topic and bet to see how long it takes for you to head for the gutter. Could be worth more than Lotto probably.

And we could also start a money pool on each new topic you enter and bet how many times you make it a personal fight with insults!
(edited)

when someone proves you wrong with a verifiable fact you resort to 5th grade school yard name-calling

first of all, I haven't seen anyone giving any facts that contradict what I'm saying

and as for the name calling...check your last post missy, then think whether you have any right to judge anybody

Borkos007 it's not other peoples facts only yours and yours alone. Now if you want me to go back and start reposting all of your crap from the past I'm game.

Charles Hill ok by me. I have only posted around 10 comments or so in my life, so probably not a smart bet on your part. The ball is in your court big boy...

I've read all of CCSAHARA's posts in the other international forum's topics and can we all agree to just not respond to him anymore? I think most of us, if not all, agree that there are some significant things he does not understand to make discussions about this game worthwhile. Also, the name calling and insults to those he is trying to converse with is like talking to a 1st grade bully. I certainly will not respond to him, and it would make these forums more enjoyable if I didn't have to read through the 'cat fights' when others respond to his ignorance and arrogance. Sorry for getting off topic but this has bugged me for a while. Thanks.

You can count on me from now on. :)