Subject: News - Sokker Improvements

You can count on me from now on. :)

+ 1

but in general when somebody post realy bullshit and will do the same after correcting, he is not worth any further posts. So please do not only with this guy but with all people who only came to troll here.
(edited)

We are not against the changes, we are against this change about 2nd tactic, the others (For example the tax changes) are OK.

How can you be against 2nd tactic? Most of users were eagerly awaiting it. It is great that it was implemented.

we are against this change about 2nd tactic

How often have you tried playing with 2 tactics in Sokker, knowing it is a bad change ...? ;)
(edited)

Changes made = Not everyone happy

Fact of life sadly.

True that.

It is great that it was implemented.

Nothing more to say.

Hi all..

For example : My real Tactic 5 3 2 atack at the meadle.. my ex tactic is 5 3 1(W) 1 atack at wing..

When ı was 1-0 losing ı wanna go ex tactic and substiton one striker to a Winger.. my new winger will be ATT pos ? if yes this changes is unhelpfull , but if he can play as MID it is very usefull..

waiting your answers.. ty

I think he will stay as ATT

I just thinking logically. I wrote my arguments why it is bad in the other topic, read it.

He will play as ATT, since you only change the position of the players on the field (i.e. the tactic) but not the lineup and not the order.

The only ones who are against it are probably the ones who cheat!

oops:)
(edited)

The only ones who are against it are probably the ones who cheat!

Flawless logic.

He will play as ATT, since you only change the position of the players on the field (i.e. the tactic) but not the lineup and not the order.

So ; there is just ofensive or defensive changes.. not for line up changes ... of course we can make similar tactics different but no change number of DEF s MID s or ATTs.. ;( That is bad..