Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: much injuries and red cards
if you have nothing smart to say, do not spam my topic
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yes. 34% (27)
No. 30% (24)
No! Actually, it should be more! 11% (9)
Yes! Sometimes I want to leave the game because of that. 25% (20)
It took just a few hours.
No. 30% (24)
No! Actually, it should be more! 11% (9)
Yes! Sometimes I want to leave the game because of that. 25% (20)
It took just a few hours.
More? When did I wrote this? Didn't you wrote something about lying .... ?
And where did you read that it refered to you? I was talking generally about 2 groups of people voting against the idea of this poll. I don't even know which group of these 2 you belong to but I do know it's one of them. I am amazed that there are people voting for more. I think they're mostly just being mean about this poll. I am glad to hear that at least you didn't vote for more.
People love to complain, didn't you know this already after a couple of years on Sokker? Isn't something new right? And as always on Sokker, those who love to complain will mostly vote negative when they find something to complain about.
Besides, ofcourse everyone (or most) want less cards and injuries. If I make a poll with 'who wants more money' I also already know the result without making a poll.
You are trying to demagogically banalize this initiative. This is not complaining and it isn't about wanting to have "less cards for myself". This is not the same as wanting to have "more money" as you imply. You can't have more money without someone having less of it.
Less injuries and cards would be a benefit for everyone. This initiative is actually saying "let's have less random in cards and injuries". Another one might say "let's have more random in matches" by e.g. reducing skill spans and deleting skills 0-7 so that players having them don't seem like they should be playing at the paralympics and so that we don't have 25:0 results any more. Let's move random from where there's too much of it to where there's not enough so that this game can be much more fun.
(edited)
And where did you read that it refered to you? I was talking generally about 2 groups of people voting against the idea of this poll. I don't even know which group of these 2 you belong to but I do know it's one of them. I am amazed that there are people voting for more. I think they're mostly just being mean about this poll. I am glad to hear that at least you didn't vote for more.
People love to complain, didn't you know this already after a couple of years on Sokker? Isn't something new right? And as always on Sokker, those who love to complain will mostly vote negative when they find something to complain about.
Besides, ofcourse everyone (or most) want less cards and injuries. If I make a poll with 'who wants more money' I also already know the result without making a poll.
You are trying to demagogically banalize this initiative. This is not complaining and it isn't about wanting to have "less cards for myself". This is not the same as wanting to have "more money" as you imply. You can't have more money without someone having less of it.
Less injuries and cards would be a benefit for everyone. This initiative is actually saying "let's have less random in cards and injuries". Another one might say "let's have more random in matches" by e.g. reducing skill spans and deleting skills 0-7 so that players having them don't seem like they should be playing at the paralympics and so that we don't have 25:0 results any more. Let's move random from where there's too much of it to where there's not enough so that this game can be much more fun.
(edited)
Less injuries and cards would be a benefit for everyone.
I don't agree. As I don't have a lot of injuries and red cards, it would be an advantage for my rivals, those who wants to play just with too much agressive tactics with no effort in knowing the game.
For me injuries and red cards is a good part of the game. If my opponents makes agressively tactics without risk of injuries, then the game becomes more matemathically played, less interesting, less football at all.
I don't agree. As I don't have a lot of injuries and red cards, it would be an advantage for my rivals, those who wants to play just with too much agressive tactics with no effort in knowing the game.
For me injuries and red cards is a good part of the game. If my opponents makes agressively tactics without risk of injuries, then the game becomes more matemathically played, less interesting, less football at all.
I'll ask you nicely to stop calling this pool a "spamtopic" and "personal problem" and take a look at the pool results, and then read all posts, only here ... You know, what happens in linguistic board, stays in linguistic board! xD
Can you please teach me what is agressive tactic and how does it affect injuries or red cards?
And then explain 1 injury that happened to my U-21 player while staying in corner whole 3v3 game... ball accidentaly came to him and he had only 1 contact with ball ...not any player near.
And then explain 1 injury that happened to my U-21 player while staying in corner whole 3v3 game... ball accidentaly came to him and he had only 1 contact with ball ...not any player near.
kidding? like you?
I'm just giving my opinion. Can you respect this or do you want a war of stupid sentences?
I'm just giving my opinion. Can you respect this or do you want a war of stupid sentences?
Not to mention keeper injuries while making a save.... many keepers bump their head to post while making saves in real life football i guess. I dunno , maybe i don't watch enough real life games...
It is a bad poll as you can know the outcome without even making it, just as my example as 'who wants to have more money?'
And yes it is a spamtopic, and not only because of the bad poll but also because he already made his point to the DEVs very clearly in the Forum Sokker Linguists with a topic the same as this, which has been closed because of Kobra 79 own spamming. And knowing this is good as you can understand a bit better the uselessness of this second topic, but this time on the international forum to undo a lot of promotion work by getting more negativity into Sokker which will make people leave, over something you just have to F*** accept, leave Sokker without the whining or learn to make better tactics (as kemk also wrote before).
And not only a spamtopic but it's also nothing more as just another whining topic.
(edited)
And yes it is a spamtopic, and not only because of the bad poll but also because he already made his point to the DEVs very clearly in the Forum Sokker Linguists with a topic the same as this, which has been closed because of Kobra 79 own spamming. And knowing this is good as you can understand a bit better the uselessness of this second topic, but this time on the international forum to undo a lot of promotion work by getting more negativity into Sokker which will make people leave, over something you just have to F*** accept, leave Sokker without the whining or learn to make better tactics (as kemk also wrote before).
And not only a spamtopic but it's also nothing more as just another whining topic.
(edited)
No 1 is going to post anything about the cornertactic the topicstarter Kobra 79 is using and then start whining about cards and injuries? The same goes for ggaarrii ofcourse. Should I do it then? The irony of this is actually to obvious ....
(edited)
(edited)
Well, too many people in Serbia or Croatia are complaining about this subject... poll is to check it out are we simply whinning people or there are much more woldwide. I don't think it's spamm topic with exception of you provoking spamming...
If people want more money in sokker why not giving it to them? Or is Sokker exclusive to those who came first and wants to stay on top? I don't understand your point but i don't realy care...
my experience arguing to those kind of people like you tells me or it is actualy too obvious for me to give up as there are no facts, proofs or polls that will make you admit you are wrong...philosopher :-)
If people want more money in sokker why not giving it to them? Or is Sokker exclusive to those who came first and wants to stay on top? I don't understand your point but i don't realy care...
my experience arguing to those kind of people like you tells me or it is actualy too obvious for me to give up as there are no facts, proofs or polls that will make you admit you are wrong...philosopher :-)
I play 4 online manager footballs and none of them has so much cards and injuries like Sokker. How can you say this is bad poll when the results would be completely different in every of this 4 different games? I don't understand. This is really strange to me.
I started sokker 6 months ago and I watch national teams matches and there is always cards and injuries there. There are some completely crazy matches and I don't like it. I probably won't continue playing this for long because of it. I don't want to wait for some important Sunday match which end in cards and injuries massacre. I have better things to do.
(edited)
I started sokker 6 months ago and I watch national teams matches and there is always cards and injuries there. There are some completely crazy matches and I don't like it. I probably won't continue playing this for long because of it. I don't want to wait for some important Sunday match which end in cards and injuries massacre. I have better things to do.
(edited)
How can you say this is bad poll when the results would be completely different in every of this 4 different games?
1 pool is way too small. Check the amount of managers and the amount of votes
2 pool is biased. I see way more serbs than there should be if there was no bias
3 people who dont agree with the opinion of the poll starter wont even bother to reply on yet another poll
Probably I missed a couple.
1 pool is way too small. Check the amount of managers and the amount of votes
2 pool is biased. I see way more serbs than there should be if there was no bias
3 people who dont agree with the opinion of the poll starter wont even bother to reply on yet another poll
Probably I missed a couple.