Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: much injuries and red cards
your first comparison is wrong because if you get a straight red in premier league or any soccer game its auto 3 game ban... in that case you are looking at maybe 50% of red cards being straight so they miss average of 2 games with a red card,
3 yellows seems reasonable compared to 5 in prem league. also 10th card = 2 game ban 15th, 3 game etc...
injuries, yeah some players seem more prone to injuries than others.. my main thought about injuries is
1 tactics, and
2 playmaker,pace,tech
higher PM means they get rid of ball before being tackled = less injuries,
higher pace = gets away sooner,
higher tech = bad... tackled more, holds onto ball. if combined with low pace and pm its deadly.
about tactics.. some tactics give more injuries.. you see this with likes of you complaining.. you use similar tactics a lot. same tactic, same injuries in same positions.. you wonder why why me.. its because your tactic isnt "efficient" your players have no options and end up getting tackled and injured more.
every team suffers equally i feel... what you want is all players with macx talent, no injuries ever, no cards ever... maybe you should play volleyball online or something...
yes the game is frustrating, but imagine if they reduce it and someone gets a 20 day injury.. it wud be end of world then!
about often injured players.. michael owen, owen hargreaves, etc... every team has 2-3 players like this :D
(edited)
3 yellows seems reasonable compared to 5 in prem league. also 10th card = 2 game ban 15th, 3 game etc...
injuries, yeah some players seem more prone to injuries than others.. my main thought about injuries is
1 tactics, and
2 playmaker,pace,tech
higher PM means they get rid of ball before being tackled = less injuries,
higher pace = gets away sooner,
higher tech = bad... tackled more, holds onto ball. if combined with low pace and pm its deadly.
about tactics.. some tactics give more injuries.. you see this with likes of you complaining.. you use similar tactics a lot. same tactic, same injuries in same positions.. you wonder why why me.. its because your tactic isnt "efficient" your players have no options and end up getting tackled and injured more.
every team suffers equally i feel... what you want is all players with macx talent, no injuries ever, no cards ever... maybe you should play volleyball online or something...
yes the game is frustrating, but imagine if they reduce it and someone gets a 20 day injury.. it wud be end of world then!
about often injured players.. michael owen, owen hargreaves, etc... every team has 2-3 players like this :D
(edited)
-30 000 We have less.
More competition in online soccer games? Outdated looks of the site? To complicated to play for the majority of new signed up managers? Less people interested in online (soccer) games? Not enough promotion is done lately? To much complaining over things (things that managers can solve partly themselves by using better tactics and players) which makes other managers to leave Sokker? etc. etc.
I can do a lot more assumptions why the number of managers has dropped, but we don't know as it is never been fully investigated.
Your conclussion is way too simplified.
(edited)
More competition in online soccer games? Outdated looks of the site? To complicated to play for the majority of new signed up managers? Less people interested in online (soccer) games? Not enough promotion is done lately? To much complaining over things (things that managers can solve partly themselves by using better tactics and players) which makes other managers to leave Sokker? etc. etc.
I can do a lot more assumptions why the number of managers has dropped, but we don't know as it is never been fully investigated.
Your conclussion is way too simplified.
(edited)
In this game ... 5 injuries
http://online.sokker.org/comment.php?matchID=18485687
http://online.sokker.org/comment.php?matchID=18485687
You are trying to change minds of sokker players for the wrong reasons.FOR YOURSELF.
Exactly, unfortunately changing their minds into the negative direction. Not really, or better, absolutely not something a promotor should do. And I wrote the same to him, he isn't trying to help Sokker but mainly himself.
Exactly, unfortunately changing their minds into the negative direction. Not really, or better, absolutely not something a promotor should do. And I wrote the same to him, he isn't trying to help Sokker but mainly himself.
Kobra has introduced our 30 people on this game, 20 of them regularly pay plus, I am responsible for all the people in Serbia over the payment plus, the man everyone helps with the promotion of the club, we organize meetings of people who play this game, sokker advertised in various ways, and continue to bring people to this game, judging a Kobra, it's not fair, he just wants to help the game even better
If he really wants to help Sokker, he does it in a very precarious way if you ask me.
Topicname: Managers should earn more money!
Poll: Do you think that managers should earn more money in this game?
1. Yes
2. Yes! Sometimes I want to leave the game because I don't earn enough.
3. No
4. No! Actually, it should be less!
I am glad that you made this comparison because it's totally unrelated. It only shows your inability to think within an apropriate context. This stupid money poll would get you the same results wherever money is an instrument, being a virtual game of any kind or RL.
One user here asked you a question that you voluntarily avoided. I will repeat it. If this poll is that meaningless as you claim it to be, why would it then have very different results in different comparable online football games? I personally play ManagerZone besides Sokker and I am sure that such poll there would mostly be inclined to answers "No" and "No! Actually, it should be more!" I would simply vote "No." there.
So, in fact, your argument is ridiculous. This poll is logically aimed at relative comparison between comparable contexts: RL football and other football games. In this sense it is very relevant even though you dislike it only because of its results.
And comparing results of this poll to number of users is utterly cynical. You should compare it to other polls within sokker and the time they have been running since. If you would do that, you would know that getting 100+ votes in just over 1 day is one of the best poll turnouts so far. But you either don't want to do it or you voluntarily manipulate that fact. Either way, you are cherrypicking evidence as usual.
(edited)
Poll: Do you think that managers should earn more money in this game?
1. Yes
2. Yes! Sometimes I want to leave the game because I don't earn enough.
3. No
4. No! Actually, it should be less!
I am glad that you made this comparison because it's totally unrelated. It only shows your inability to think within an apropriate context. This stupid money poll would get you the same results wherever money is an instrument, being a virtual game of any kind or RL.
One user here asked you a question that you voluntarily avoided. I will repeat it. If this poll is that meaningless as you claim it to be, why would it then have very different results in different comparable online football games? I personally play ManagerZone besides Sokker and I am sure that such poll there would mostly be inclined to answers "No" and "No! Actually, it should be more!" I would simply vote "No." there.
So, in fact, your argument is ridiculous. This poll is logically aimed at relative comparison between comparable contexts: RL football and other football games. In this sense it is very relevant even though you dislike it only because of its results.
And comparing results of this poll to number of users is utterly cynical. You should compare it to other polls within sokker and the time they have been running since. If you would do that, you would know that getting 100+ votes in just over 1 day is one of the best poll turnouts so far. But you either don't want to do it or you voluntarily manipulate that fact. Either way, you are cherrypicking evidence as usual.
(edited)
at least some work unlike you.
I have given you proof and you lie to yourself that this is OK.
edit: - Charles Hill
(edited)
I have given you proof and you lie to yourself that this is OK.
edit: - Charles Hill
(edited)
Don't worry, Sava. It's nothing personal from Charles. He goes "ad hominem" to anyone having better arguments than him.
sometimes necessary to tell the truth to make things better, I have the impression that we are all too weak to criticize about games, if statistics say that every year more and more people leave this game and we talk to Greg's all fine and great, it does not take well to this game, this one is my thinking
sometimes necessary to ... one is my thinking
Believe me, greg absolutely knows my opinion and also he and I most of the time don't agree with each other how things are going at the moment. And the last thing I do is telling him how great it all is when it's not ;)
You have access to the Forum Sokker Linguists so you can read all my posts to him and check it out yourself.
Believe me, greg absolutely knows my opinion and also he and I most of the time don't agree with each other how things are going at the moment. And the last thing I do is telling him how great it all is when it's not ;)
You have access to the Forum Sokker Linguists so you can read all my posts to him and check it out yourself.
I read this forum, and for this reason I write all this
at my disposal with evidence.
wait for Saturday national team, you will see funny things and every Saturday
wait for Saturday national team, you will see funny things and every Saturday
that is all right, we would not be discussed now and it would be our one million users, I love this game, and I want it progresses for the better, but more people are leaving this game, I think I should point out that Greg on the right errors games, be it the better and we all