Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: NEWS New 3D Match Viewer!
well, it looks very good in other camera types, u just have to pay :)
:) i like 3D Match viewer,I think it perfect, if it has extra repeat goal :).
you can not have tunned perfectly both, 3D and 2D... so if we had to choose we choose 3D and people had to buy normal computers :-)
I have a very strong computer, that can easily run this 3D thingie. And yeah, it looks nice and new and shiny and all, but I still, by a large margin, prefer 2D. First of all, as somebody else already pointed out, 2D is vastly superior when it comes to analysing opponent and prepare tactics. Second, for me the 2D match viewer and engine is/was just the soul-essence of Sokker, and I enjoyed watching my little matchstick men in an easy-to-follow perspective. Granted, 3D is a buffed up and shiny new alternative to watch matches, but I don't think it should come at the cost of its magnificent 2D viewer/strategic tool. Have the developers not heard of "backward compatibility"?
Or maybe this is just a sneaky way of moving users to the 3D viewer and phase out the 2D, in an attempt to make it harder for managers to analyse tactics. Because with the 3D viewer and the "covering defender" change together it truly is moving in that direction. So more randomness and less intelectual influence. Why not take the full step and make matches completely Hattrickified.
I have a very strong computer, that can easily run this 3D thingie. And yeah, it looks nice and new and shiny and all, but I still, by a large margin, prefer 2D. First of all, as somebody else already pointed out, 2D is vastly superior when it comes to analysing opponent and prepare tactics. Second, for me the 2D match viewer and engine is/was just the soul-essence of Sokker, and I enjoyed watching my little matchstick men in an easy-to-follow perspective. Granted, 3D is a buffed up and shiny new alternative to watch matches, but I don't think it should come at the cost of its magnificent 2D viewer/strategic tool. Have the developers not heard of "backward compatibility"?
Or maybe this is just a sneaky way of moving users to the 3D viewer and phase out the 2D, in an attempt to make it harder for managers to analyse tactics. Because with the 3D viewer and the "covering defender" change together it truly is moving in that direction. So more randomness and less intelectual influence. Why not take the full step and make matches completely Hattrickified.
I too have a good PC and can watch 3D with 60 fps. Even though, i prefer to watch my games in 2D. Maybe its because i dont have Plus. But even watching my yesterdays game in 3D doesnt change that it was disaster.
P.S.: Not everyone has a good PC, so you cant tell to them they should get a better PC. There is the option to watch games in both 3D and 2D, so it should run fluently in both viewers.
P.S.: Not everyone has a good PC, so you cant tell to them they should get a better PC. There is the option to watch games in both 3D and 2D, so it should run fluently in both viewers.
+1
but i think we will move slowly to 3D viewer in,maybe 2-3 seasons,untill then, he will be fine tuned(i hope..just a prediction)
but i think we will move slowly to 3D viewer in,maybe 2-3 seasons,untill then, he will be fine tuned(i hope..just a prediction)
I too have a good PC and can watch 3D with 60 fps. Even though, i prefer to watch my games in 2D. Maybe its because i dont have Plus. But even watching my yesterdays game in 3D doesnt change that it was disaster.
I have so same PC Type, and I am Plus, and I prefer the 2D match because , players and ball are good size, with 3D sometimes players has size who decrease, and sometimes the ball is viewed with difficulty, because the ball is too little, it is smaller than the sideline ????
I have so same PC Type, and I am Plus, and I prefer the 2D match because , players and ball are good size, with 3D sometimes players has size who decrease, and sometimes the ball is viewed with difficulty, because the ball is too little, it is smaller than the sideline ????
Or maybe this is just a sneaky way of moving users to the 3D viewer and phase out the 2D
Of course it is. There's only 1 way to enjoy the 3D viewer - Plus. If 2D is messed up, you need Plus to watch matches properly.
Of course it is. There's only 1 way to enjoy the 3D viewer - Plus. If 2D is messed up, you need Plus to watch matches properly.
point is:
3d sux,2d rules! This game had something special with its own 2D matches,its not point of 3D matches...But lets say ok for 3D,but u ruined sokker totally with new ME and other stupid things. And the point of doing all of this is to bring more people to play sokker,the one's that cant understand game,and dont know how to make tactics,so you made automatic def attack so it makes it easier for them and not to quit it fast,coz they have stupid little nice 3D...This game is going to die if it continuous like this.
3d sux,2d rules! This game had something special with its own 2D matches,its not point of 3D matches...But lets say ok for 3D,but u ruined sokker totally with new ME and other stupid things. And the point of doing all of this is to bring more people to play sokker,the one's that cant understand game,and dont know how to make tactics,so you made automatic def attack so it makes it easier for them and not to quit it fast,coz they have stupid little nice 3D...This game is going to die if it continuous like this.
I can't see the ball with the 3D Match viewer . I'm getting blind
(edited)
(edited)
so what is the champions cup report ? ME is better than yesterday or what? somebody comment
wasnt very good for you as i see. damn this problem is getting a lot worse
You can make tactics in 3d too, maybe better. Everything new is bad, I understand. Problem is when you dont have plus,.that is true.