Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: New match engine discussion
The worst thing is when this me dont mesure the skills
i want an answer from abcde,if he can of course to say
if is possible the players playing according to their skills
is a train and tactical game after all
if the devs they cant give us this,then ok,we know what kind of game is
and i think after we dont have many complains
But if they can,they must start soon to fix this
(edited)
i want an answer from abcde,if he can of course to say
if is possible the players playing according to their skills
is a train and tactical game after all
if the devs they cant give us this,then ok,we know what kind of game is
and i think after we dont have many complains
But if they can,they must start soon to fix this
(edited)
1. about random, i notice it is not random anymore. at least on my match. weaker team average mark always lose now. only one or two team can draw or win. (i think some one if has time should proof this by checking all match this weeks on 98 countries. we take sample sunday match and thursday arcade match. and see if it is true the ME not random anymore or still by see how many match win by stronger team on the same day, how many draw, and how many stronger team lost).
My game today, my team 60 vs opponent team 67, played 60mins with 10 man and won 3-1....had 5 attempts (3 goals , 1 vs 1 and hit the post from corner) he had 19 chances and scored once and hit post twice.
I can say I am good but I think ME helps a lot low rated teams. I see that regularly during my NT matches. I play well against good teams and I am struggling against weaker teams. Could be a coincidence , could be I perform well against stronger teams, could be I underestimate lower teams. But I am pretty sure the ME/Randomness plays an important role.
(edited)
My game today, my team 60 vs opponent team 67, played 60mins with 10 man and won 3-1....had 5 attempts (3 goals , 1 vs 1 and hit the post from corner) he had 19 chances and scored once and hit post twice.
I can say I am good but I think ME helps a lot low rated teams. I see that regularly during my NT matches. I play well against good teams and I am struggling against weaker teams. Could be a coincidence , could be I perform well against stronger teams, could be I underestimate lower teams. But I am pretty sure the ME/Randomness plays an important role.
(edited)
the statistic in this match is bugged. it only shown the statistic of the home team and duplicated in to the away team's statistic. you can check the match and see for yourself. at the 4th minutes, the home team injured player number 7, while himself is still playing for the away team.
No plus, no "see for yourself". And still home team wins 4:1 playing 10 vs 11? - Yes that is cool.
(edited)
(edited)
people dont like statistics though ;)
even with proof you cant argue with people who say "my team is better why did i lose?"
Indeed :/
even with proof you cant argue with people who say "my team is better why did i lose?"
Indeed :/
im more concerned than anything about the new 300s waittime to watch games.
ok it annoys me, but encourages plus.
i just think for new users, their main reason for being here was to see match engine etc.. now they cant even do that..
i would like if for new players there was a 1yr delay before the wait is introduced. new players should be given as many positives as possible to get them addicted to the game and want to stay
ok it annoys me, but encourages plus.
i just think for new users, their main reason for being here was to see match engine etc.. now they cant even do that..
i would like if for new players there was a 1yr delay before the wait is introduced. new players should be given as many positives as possible to get them addicted to the game and want to stay
well i prefer others way,
ads appear during match on moving sentence on below and the frame little bit smaller just for the moving sentence.
such as on some indonesia tv when football match. the ads such as coffee appear on right and below side for about 30s and then back to normal again. and then on half time, ads came again for about 3 minutes then match play.
ads appear during match on moving sentence on below and the frame little bit smaller just for the moving sentence.
such as on some indonesia tv when football match. the ads such as coffee appear on right and below side for about 30s and then back to normal again. and then on half time, ads came again for about 3 minutes then match play.
words are worthless,thats why i give up playing,relegate my team to lower division,waiting for a miracle
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://online.sokker.org/comment/matchID/22486183
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://online.sokker.org/comment/matchID/22486183
wow, this is crazy. 4 shots 4 goals from strikers. that is some bullshit even if they are 1x1 chances.
well.... around the same i guess, at least rating difference dont burn eyes so much like that match :D
I have 3 matches in this season, where my opponents scored from almost every opportuinities: They had 2/3; 4/5; 5/7 goals/shots stats. If my team learn this efficiency I will be almost unbeatable.
Included the cup and friendly matches? That would make it 3 out of 27 matches (only 11%). Or also included the 13 junior matches? That would make it 3 out of 40 matches (only 7.5%).
All would be put in much better perspective the moment managers stop posting single exceptions and start posting the % of matches it happened. And when it happened not 10% or less of the matches but for example 30% of the matches, then you can start asking the question if something is wrong. But still the right questions have to be asked first (these are a few of these questions):
1) how much stronger was the opponent;
2) are the GK + defenders good enough and/or are the forwards much better;
3) Is the manager good enough e.g. what kind of bad and predictable tactic did he use;
4) How good is the other manager e.g. did he made a good tactic targeting the weak(er) positions of the opponent;
5) just bad luck;
6) highly unlickely: non of the 5 previous points, then maybe it is the ME.
And I have only 5 points before point 6, but most probably forgot many more questions before the last question has to be asked.
(edited)
All would be put in much better perspective the moment managers stop posting single exceptions and start posting the % of matches it happened. And when it happened not 10% or less of the matches but for example 30% of the matches, then you can start asking the question if something is wrong. But still the right questions have to be asked first (these are a few of these questions):
1) how much stronger was the opponent;
2) are the GK + defenders good enough and/or are the forwards much better;
3) Is the manager good enough e.g. what kind of bad and predictable tactic did he use;
4) How good is the other manager e.g. did he made a good tactic targeting the weak(er) positions of the opponent;
5) just bad luck;
6) highly unlickely: non of the 5 previous points, then maybe it is the ME.
And I have only 5 points before point 6, but most probably forgot many more questions before the last question has to be asked.
(edited)