Subject: »Do you like the new ME?

btw, Eesti - Polska 0:4, shots 5 - 8, we just played a liitle bit more offensively... and what, we should scored minimum 7 goals? :>
(edited)

The ME is bad but the worst thing was BMI implementations.

My best players are with BMI 25-26 which is bad. If i want to make them fit they have to play 2 games per week. If i want to train them properly i have to loose a slot or play them on different position in the official game which is kinda stupid.

So what again the game forces me to sell and buy.

And the most unfair thing is that you train and grown your players you selected them per skills and now you are stacked with fat guys.

Nice Greg you are genius you want all people that enjoy training to gave up i guess.

more offensively? well that's how i play. the one with the most chances usually wins was my principle so high scores were normal in my games in any previous season. with the previous engine from last season i even had a couple of 5-5 and even a 6-6 result. not realistic? sure but at least it was exiting enough and at least tactic still seemed to matter enough.

now it looks like the main thing which determines a score is individual striker vs keeper and the behavior of the ME is all measured to act 'normal' ... well at the highest levels, while the majority of managers is not at that level!
guess i'm supposed to somehow buy at least an unearthly striker now if i want to rise? how's that realistic in 4th division? :s

Did you play any game after ME improvement? I don't think so. Do you realy thing your tactic is good enough, with the MID orders players in attack? What you expect? Minimum 50% accuracy on all your games? Please...

Are you serious with this fckng bmi? :>

who cares if the strikers have mid or att orders? I doesn't have an impact on accuracy...

anyway...I have a feeling that it's too easy to play for a 0:0 in the new engine...it's very easy to kill the game of opponent...541 and you have to pray for one situation to score

It's very unpredictable.

i dont like the part of man marking as it is made..... often the winger now gets to run an half field because they want to mark the striker.....

when a team does 20 shoots and get only one goal, this is not tactic problem. this is ME problem.
if the same team does 5 shoots or less in the same conditions, ok that is a tactic problem

+1

From reality - if i good remember two days ago Portugal has about 20 shots against Czech Republic, and? But who cares of reality in sokker, then how you explain me, lets say - match Poland vs Estonia, where we have 8 shots and scores four times?

problem is not the ratio score/attempt , but the too easy shots from good striker missed completely ^^.
Same with head shot.

Not all teams have superdivine strikers...

Even if there is one or two games that have high scoring on a very low amount of scoring chances... that is just a rarity on the ME.

Focus on the general outcome of all the games. At a very high percentage.. lets say even at least 90% of them or very low scoring games and most of them with a lot of scoring chances.

And as it has been mentioned, very easy scoring chances that the forwards are missing.

Earlier today Makedonija scored 3 times from 4 shots. One of them was penalty and was scored.
Only miss hit the bar and then sidebar and went out.

Cymru 2-0 België

Cymru België
All for Cymru II Tactics Canadian lumberj
47% Possession 53%
72% Play in the half 28%
4 Shots 16
4 Fouls 5
2 Yellow cards 2
0 Red cards 0
3 Offsides 1
71.4 average mark 81.6
excellent Shooting outstanding
excellent Passing incredible
incredible Defending magical

:D :D :D

Good ME ^_^