Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Do you like the new ME?
well I had a nice backpass in last game - 3rd minute, Pałysz playing with MID order, excellent playmaker
he has a ball uncovered near opponent's goal area, on his right there is a winger with LOTS of free space, no def near him
what Playsz decides to do? he passess looong way back to the left defender [he was on right side, so it's the longest pass he could've done!!] who is covered by striker - in result I lose a goal
he has a ball uncovered near opponent's goal area, on his right there is a winger with LOTS of free space, no def near him
what Playsz decides to do? he passess looong way back to the left defender [he was on right side, so it's the longest pass he could've done!!] who is covered by striker - in result I lose a goal
:)))
to be honest, after I've seen how my strikers act with MID orders [2 of them have high pm] I decided that I won't be playing for 1st place in this season, just planning to avoid relegation and I will attack the 1st place next season when my strikers will be better in technique
now it's just stupid...when the ball is in penalty area they sometimes make 2-3 passes before making shot :)
to be honest, after I've seen how my strikers act with MID orders [2 of them have high pm] I decided that I won't be playing for 1st place in this season, just planning to avoid relegation and I will attack the 1st place next season when my strikers will be better in technique
now it's just stupid...when the ball is in penalty area they sometimes make 2-3 passes before making shot :)
Has somebody tried standard tactics with the new engine (against equal opponents)? This is a serious question :p
The big question the ME beetwen the transfer market....
With the new ME the defenders, and midfileders trainer an lose a lot of money, when they sell his world class player. The defs, and mids loose prizes. But the strikers prize is on the top. The managers need change if they want profit. Now I train mids, but I will change for striker training.
Another opinion, about the new ME:
In the real life a midfielder can get a goal against a wolrd class keeper.
Well, before the changes, I got a goal without striker, but now I haven't a striker for 1 sokker year, but I can't get a goal with this changes. I had a goal situation, when my player kickied out the ball the opponent goal line.
With the new ME the defenders, and midfileders trainer an lose a lot of money, when they sell his world class player. The defs, and mids loose prizes. But the strikers prize is on the top. The managers need change if they want profit. Now I train mids, but I will change for striker training.
Another opinion, about the new ME:
In the real life a midfielder can get a goal against a wolrd class keeper.
Well, before the changes, I got a goal without striker, but now I haven't a striker for 1 sokker year, but I can't get a goal with this changes. I had a goal situation, when my player kickied out the ball the opponent goal line.
The strikers pass a lot... This was a good option on the old ME, as I give a MID option my striker, if I played against a deep line system team. But now, I can't choose. If I play with striker with ATT option, he pass lot too...
i still don't see what the problem people have with this ME. Yes, some results are a bit unpredictable, but for me it adds to the fun of the game. i now use different tactics to what i used a while ago, and people who play with a single isolated winger, as there only attacking mid shouldn't complain when they lose and say 'they dominated the game'. What, in your own half?
This ME in my opinion in more realistic, in the fact that you need more than 3 attacking players. i understand that their can(must) be improvements, but I think there going the right way about it. 1v1's are now more important to make, and pin point crosses are now less deadly, making tactics even more important.
Just my opinion and I know people will disagree, but where all allowed an opinion.
This ME in my opinion in more realistic, in the fact that you need more than 3 attacking players. i understand that their can(must) be improvements, but I think there going the right way about it. 1v1's are now more important to make, and pin point crosses are now less deadly, making tactics even more important.
Just my opinion and I know people will disagree, but where all allowed an opinion.
Im not trying to defend myself, but there is to much weird results, situation and what is the worst is the efficiency to make teams "more closer"...
I´m not, but thanks anyway ;) and we can keep discusing it all night but what shows it the most is the number of managers who are leaving this game. And they are not begginers who didnt even log in, but old skillfull managers! And this game is not so attractive for new users...
(edited)
(edited)
Look, 'weird' results have been here ALWAYS...check older games...
what is interesting though is that bad scoring ration always happens to same people...so maybe it's not all the fault of the ME?
having said that, since I train Italy, I've checked many tactic. With most of them I get chances etc. but I have problems with finishing - but every time I change to one 433 tactic, suddenly there are lots of goals...
what is interesting though is that bad scoring ration always happens to same people...so maybe it's not all the fault of the ME?
having said that, since I train Italy, I've checked many tactic. With most of them I get chances etc. but I have problems with finishing - but every time I change to one 433 tactic, suddenly there are lots of goals...