Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: »Do you like the new ME?

2012-11-11 10:20:48
in RL it always depends from which league we refer to, and if that league is made by teams with almost the same strongness.

anyway I won't compare SK to RL, it's an old and odd question that I've never understood..

The fact is that GK are "forced" to be stronger than normal to keep those results average equal or at least a little bit higher than in RL.
2012-11-11 13:40:52
Lets take a look at my those matches. The first one was played last sunday.
http://online.sokker.org/comment.php?matchID=20396899
The result is 0:8.
After that I decided to change nothing, to prove, that sokker is random.
So the only thing I have changed has been the fact that I have used mirror.
Here is the match:
http://online.sokker.org/comment.php?matchID=20396900
The result is 4:0.
The conditions and squads has been same.
And there is 12 goals difference. Isnt it a little bit random? :D
2012-11-11 13:52:41
Funny :D
And of course sad in the same time :(
2012-11-11 13:52:47
Message deleted

2012-11-11 14:11:06
this time it is funny for me too :-)
But I was really angry after the first match which was a big lose :D
2012-11-11 21:29:45
Sokker UBER FAIL tonight in my game lol :)

but all it did was prove me right in my thoughts on sokker , i can wholly understand why THOUSANDS of users have walked away
2012-11-12 11:03:04
I see just a championship game, where you used an injuried GK against a 91 mark striker.
And your opponent changed a 45 mark midfielder to a 67mark MID:)
2012-11-12 11:45:42
lol yeah.... i didnt notice that before now..... there is really big difference on the two teams strikers, and ofc the team with a striker that has three as much in value/wage will be more effecient....
2012-11-12 14:17:47
look at previous game ;)

i dont mind losing lol , but almost identical teams albeit i put in a far better mid , and had over 3x shots lol :)

thats sokker ! :)
2012-11-13 14:03:18
Yeah, your right, that is sokker now, and should be this way... when he has a striker thats much better then yours but you have better tactic and better midfield, then the matches will change often, you cant be guarenteed that just because you have more shots then him you then automatically win.... this isnt even a 20-1 in shots lose as some people have shown (which can de debatted that there is too many of), this is a match where he produces quite a number of shots, shot by a dangerous striker on an injured keeper.. and that you arent capable of scoring isnt rocket science, your strikers are low class and will therefore miss a lot of chances sometimes....

2012-12-02 21:58:05
When will be changes in the ME?

Today I coould have won the match in the old ME. I came with winger, and the opponent came with only 4 defs. But my winger forgot to pass with good form, and did idiot things. But this isn't the only one match. I started to think 4 def really enough and don't need wingers. Everybody can play with 4-3-3...
2012-12-02 23:28:17
well.. I think it is better the way it is. I mean, "I´m playing with winger and opponent is playing 4 def - so I must win" - sounds kinda.. not football. you want everybody playing 5-6 defenders?
2012-12-03 10:32:28
+1
2012-12-03 15:42:25
Everybody can change his stadium size, this is my opinoin.
2012-12-03 16:23:17
there seems to be something wrong with the form.
my forward yesterday, form very good, did nearly nothing, always started far too late and was totally slowed down by angie.
pace unearthly, but acted like a youthplayer
he played as if his form was tragic
(edited)
2012-12-03 16:26:06
Maybe he was injured?
(edited)