Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: How do you watch the matches?
You missed one thing:
-2D: Non-plus user
- 2D: I like it more than the 3D
- 2D: my pc sucks!
- 3D: I like it more than the 2D
-2D: Non-plus user
- 2D: I like it more than the 3D
- 2D: my pc sucks!
- 3D: I like it more than the 2D
Nonsense, if you have a good computer you will always choose 3D.
If i look at 3D on my computer and put the right camara stand it is fantastic!!!
A lot of people here have to blame their computer, not 3D.
If i look at 3D on my computer and put the right camara stand it is fantastic!!!
A lot of people here have to blame their computer, not 3D.
It is not obviously nonsense
I watch matches mostly in:
2D
74% (267)
3D
17% (62)
I don't watch live matches
9% (31)
Votes: 360 total.
And who you are to tell all users who have chosen 2D preference !
And for people who can't see 3D, pay them a new PC as you feel so great to see matchs with this viewer !
I watch matches mostly in:
2D
74% (267)
3D
17% (62)
I don't watch live matches
9% (31)
Votes: 360 total.
And who you are to tell all users who have chosen 2D preference !
And for people who can't see 3D, pay them a new PC as you feel so great to see matchs with this viewer !
Don't spoil your time arguing with people who think that God speaks by their mouths, or that show their 'proficiency' in Logics by pretending to estabish 'axiomas' such as:
- I prefer 2D -> I have and obsolete PC
- I have and obsolete PC -> I prefer 2D
as they are more false than Judas.
I know many users (myself included) whose PCs allow us to play on-line the last shooters and such with the best performances, but who for viewing our matches in Sokker prefer anyway 2D -> So, the validity of these two 'universal premises' is, this simple way, demostrated to be none.
... or maybe they are simply pretending to INSULT those who prefer 2D, by impliying that they consider all of them to be little more than poor assholes without means to buy a PC made in the XXI century? ...
- I prefer 2D -> I have and obsolete PC
- I have and obsolete PC -> I prefer 2D
as they are more false than Judas.
I know many users (myself included) whose PCs allow us to play on-line the last shooters and such with the best performances, but who for viewing our matches in Sokker prefer anyway 2D -> So, the validity of these two 'universal premises' is, this simple way, demostrated to be none.
... or maybe they are simply pretending to INSULT those who prefer 2D, by impliying that they consider all of them to be little more than poor assholes without means to buy a PC made in the XXI century? ...
i have a good computer. the 3D is running smoothly without any problem with my PC. but what is the point to watch the 3D matches if you only can see it in one type of camera angle (the stadium view)? it's too far away!
if i want to analyze tactics, i'll go for 2D. but if i wanna have some fun of course i use the 3D. but since the default 3D viewer for non-plus users now become "the stadium angle" only (before it was "the normal angle"), i lost that have some fun part on this game new feature.
no matter what zoom or height i use, i still can't see the players hair colors, the players numbers on their kit, and of course the different team kit types (if it's really gonna implemented) no more. :(
if i want to analyze tactics, i'll go for 2D. but if i wanna have some fun of course i use the 3D. but since the default 3D viewer for non-plus users now become "the stadium angle" only (before it was "the normal angle"), i lost that have some fun part on this game new feature.
no matter what zoom or height i use, i still can't see the players hair colors, the players numbers on their kit, and of course the different team kit types (if it's really gonna implemented) no more. :(
A lot of people here have to blame their computer, not 3D.
or their old flash/java version :-)
I was at my parents' home for a couple of days and watched one game on a new HP laptop with 1 or 2gb graphic card
the 3d was totally laggy and bad looking, but after java update it worked 100% correct
or their old flash/java version :-)
I was at my parents' home for a couple of days and watched one game on a new HP laptop with 1 or 2gb graphic card
the 3d was totally laggy and bad looking, but after java update it worked 100% correct
actually I have plus and I watch the games with stadium camera
with proper zoom and height it's much better than 2d
with proper zoom and height it's much better than 2d
2D still rules for me. I only watch 3D occasionally and never live, but only to see the match in another appearance and only if I have enough spare time - which I rarely have.
But... I was wondering if we should have had this vote option too?
- None: I can't bear watching matches anymore after the changes and finetuning - at least not without periodic fast forwarding. ;)
-2D: Non-plus user
- 2D: I like it more than the 3D
- 2D: my pc sucks!
- 3D: I like it more than the 2D
But... I was wondering if we should have had this vote option too?
- None: I can't bear watching matches anymore after the changes and finetuning - at least not without periodic fast forwarding. ;)
-2D: Non-plus user
- 2D: I like it more than the 3D
- 2D: my pc sucks!
- 3D: I like it more than the 2D
or their old flash/java version :-)
Which versions do you use?
Which versions do you use?
