Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: How do you watch the matches?
For non Plus users, i would say the stadium camera with zoom 15% as you said, but height at 30% is better. And offcourse spacebar for fullscreen view.
someone please explain to Greg that for many users the 3d is not possible to watch for hardware limitations
For tactical reasons I watch 2D.
In Juniors match I watch 3D, and in Friendly depends, if I want to see some tactical things, 2D, if I just wanna have fun 3D.
For me it's ok that we can have both options.
In Juniors match I watch 3D, and in Friendly depends, if I want to see some tactical things, 2D, if I just wanna have fun 3D.
For me it's ok that we can have both options.
Ah, I never realized that. :) Should use my mouse more on my laptop I guess.
Actually I do it on touchpad, but it was easier to explain with the mouse button ;)
I just tried your option. And its true that for a tactical analysis it is so far the best view on the 3D. However, what I miss about this, is that at 15% you cant see the corners of the field. At 30% you can, maybe even best at 31%. But when I do that, the players and the ball just get too small.
Yes, I could zoom out for every corner kick, is not the worst thing to have to do. But I would like to see the players and ball as close as like the 15% zoom but with the entire field.
Yes, I could zoom out for every corner kick, is not the worst thing to have to do. But I would like to see the players and ball as close as like the 15% zoom but with the entire field.
Somebody knows where i can buy 2D glasses for looking the 2D sokker's match?
ok ok ----------------------->[]
ok ok ----------------------->[]
Doing some testing... I feel that this is the "closest" to a 2D view:
- Stadium View
- 28% Zoom
- 90% Height
What happens is, the "2D" view has like a 90% Height but the players look like if the camera was at a 50% Height. That is why is makes it such a nice way to see the game.
In a "normal" scenario in 2D... the players would not look so "straight forward" to camera if it was so high up there as it is.
That is why I couldn´t find a 3D angle that allowed me to see the game like in 2D.
Either I see the field at a 2D height but you almost only see the player´s heads... or you go down to see the players like in 2D but the field will have less depth...
- Stadium View
- 28% Zoom
- 90% Height
What happens is, the "2D" view has like a 90% Height but the players look like if the camera was at a 50% Height. That is why is makes it such a nice way to see the game.
In a "normal" scenario in 2D... the players would not look so "straight forward" to camera if it was so high up there as it is.
That is why I couldn´t find a 3D angle that allowed me to see the game like in 2D.
Either I see the field at a 2D height but you almost only see the player´s heads... or you go down to see the players like in 2D but the field will have less depth...
Always 2D, unfortunately. Nor my iMac neither my iPad (with iSwifter) can support 3D vision.
I watch my matches in 2D, I'm way too used to it, 3D doesn't work very well in my computer anyways.
To be honest, there are a few cameras in which analysing might even be better when you get used to it...
try:
1. camera: goal, zoom: 100%
2. camera: stadium, zoom: 15%, height: 80% - basically the same view as in the 2D
Also camera type Line, zoom 70% - 80%, height 100%
But many camera views can be used to have a good overview of the pitch to analize matches, as long as zoom and height are set the best way.
try:
1. camera: goal, zoom: 100%
2. camera: stadium, zoom: 15%, height: 80% - basically the same view as in the 2D
Also camera type Line, zoom 70% - 80%, height 100%
But many camera views can be used to have a good overview of the pitch to analize matches, as long as zoom and height are set the best way.
I cant like the "Line" camera, is too wobbly... it moves to much and it makes you dizzy. I like a stable camera instead. But that is just me.