Subject: How do you watch the matches?

I cant like the "Line" camera, is too wobbly... it moves to much and it makes you dizzy. I like a stable camera instead. But that is just me.

I'm starting to get used to it. I had the same getting a bit dizzy problem at the beginning, but now I'm ok with it. Nice thing is that everyone can choose the camera they like most :)
(edited)

Exactly. My only concern is for those who dont have Plus, I have no idea what 3D camera angle and height is available to them.

Only the stadium camera. We can set height and zoom.

Oh ok... but that is the best one in my opinion.. so all good.

I guess the main problem is that many computers cant run the 3D match.

if tactic would matter with this match engine (to be clear: it does not for most part) then 3D would be even more pointless because the real overview is in 2D even if the idea is to 'convince' managers to buy plus.
(edited)

its not the best at all.. i had access to the 3d viewer before as tutor and it was very nice.. i dont have plus now.. tried looking at a few games and just ended up switching to 2d view.

its a nice feature but just not worthwhile with the far away camera imo...

well since it's a feature and it's nice, it's quite fair that it's for plus users - buying plus finally has something to offer

sure has :)

just in case, if you read carefully. I do mean its the best of the 3D options.... further back you can read that I watch my games in 2D.

I only watch 3D because I can see there better than the 2D viewer.

hahaha...nice new 2D view
u can now change and the game name
u can call it Ants manager
(edited)

If you cannot improve the 3D, worsen the 2D :D

Ofcourse, players looking like giants on a way to small pitch was much better looking ....

Slowly I start to understand why the DEVs don't communicate, they can't do it right as some will always start to complain, even when something is changed absolutely for the better.

2D of course .......

I thought that you learnt more about psychology Charles... The real problem is not about the change but about how it is communicated in change. To make the change efficient, you need to well explain it, to be very good pedagogue, and moreover, you need to give the means to be successful.

Givng the means here is onyl having a really strong staff on the test servers to be able to provide us a really efficient new ME before giving us... Imagine i order to you to buy a new PC with a very small computer screen, a very big mouse, a weird keyboard, how do you feel ? Happy ? No, it is obvious... You wonder why creators fo this product wouldn't have tested before ? Right ?