Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: game is dead ? what would you change

2013-07-04 13:46:49
How about..you are both right..:-)
2013-07-04 13:55:43
No, im just joking, there's nothing random in this game. :) The results would be the same only if you play it in the same conditions and all the players have all their skills divine+.
2013-07-04 14:04:43
Wrong, players make arbitrary decisions, based on their skills. If these decisions were determined on beforehand, then if team A kicks off and team B scores 5 minutes later, there would be another goal 5 minutes later and another one 5 minutes later,..

I think that every action in the game is determined by a probability based on the skills:

* 2 players clash, the attacking player has 17 tech and the defending player has 14 def and they meet up front. There is 42% of a chance that the attacker is still in possession after the duel. There is some arbitrary number created: 0.16==> the attacker remains in possession.

By just choosing a different 'base number for every match', this 'arbitrary number' remains purely arbitrary and therefore different matches can have a different outcome.
2013-07-04 14:06:25
No, im just joking, there's nothing random in this game. :) The results would be the same only if you play it in the same conditions and all the players have all their skills divine+.

Today I've played 2 games with Adameczek, because there was some kind of bug and we had 2 arcade games

To games in one day, no forma change, no injuries, no skill changes, no tactic changes... Isn't in the same conditions ?
2013-07-04 14:10:02
You might be right, it's possible.
2013-07-04 14:12:22
No, because i was thinking about the same thing as myname said, if a player with 17tech meets a defender with 15def, the outcome is not always the same. But i was also wrong, because if the two have 17+ at each skill, the outcome might not be the same everytime.
2013-07-04 14:52:20
because if the two have 17+ at each skill, the outcome might not be the same everytime.
i'm sure that not
(edited)
2013-07-04 15:07:37
I'm pretty sure it's all just a battle of percantages and probabilities, plus some "random" coefficient. It would be quite boring if there would be the same outcame everytime.
2013-07-04 15:35:36
Game is dead

Thanks greg
2013-07-04 16:16:52
game is dead ?
not yet
what would you change
the owner
2013-07-04 16:17:05
lol
2013-07-04 22:10:22
but true...
2013-07-04 23:46:31
a lot
2013-07-05 09:34:46
1. I would start with a bugfixing and optimisation of the registration process --> check how registration is done and correct the bugs, give the people the team already at start and the budget after the team has been "verified" after 24 hours at the latest.
2. Increase trust in devs by better communication and maybe new people at the top that people have more respect for.
3. Less things that give disadvantages for non-plus-users, everyone starts out as non-plus-user and if you have huge disadvantages then (like 10 Minutes waiting time on match days to start your own match), then you will never get into the game at all.
4. Do the changes in small countries to reduce the league-levels that are empty at the bottom that were planned 5 years ago.
5. Make the changes on starting teams that were planned 6 years ago: make starting teams young (16-22 y) and with more skills (well for example they could be calculated as random juniors at poor+ level that have been trained by outstanding junior coach and then 1-2 additional seasons by random excellent coach?), so starting teams start with less disadvantages compared to newer teams, what keeps them interested.
6. Think about taking leagues together for the countries that run empty, maybe based on language?
Or making starter leagues for new teams. You could give new teams the option if they want to start out in international amateur league, where all new teams would start and compete against each other until they decide to "level up" on national level.
The problem is today, new teams are either bashed by teams that are here for 4-8 years or they play against bots if they start off the bat, because of the low number of new registrations. This league could be something for every team younger than 1 rl-year.
(edited)
2013-07-05 10:03:44
Rinky for....Greg
;-)
2013-07-05 12:54:17
Brilliant summary, only thing missing is ME update.... :)