Subject: game is dead ? what would you change

In low league it's not a problem, but in high league...big problem. First of all injury = you need to buy player = you need time. Secondly, you need to prepare tactics, analise the opponent etc.

Everything takes time, 1 game/week is fine.

Number of games has no connection with the loss of users...

You are wrong, game rythmn is linked on how a player is involved/commited in the game. With so slow pace, it's easy to be bored and stop. Just considering that you need 2-3 years real life time to see a complete cycle for your team make people running far from this game.

People are leaving the game in high league also, I did, and many others did.

The main problem of sokker for me is speed. It takes too long to reduce advantage to older users. Two, three real years is too much. So the first thing needed is a new training system to reduce this time.

Increase more games is a week is not good. Two is enough. Friendlies are not needed. No one cares for them except for training, so make training without them and compensates the money.

Second thing, and, as important, is to change sokker interface. Take top11 for exemple, is a crap game with lots of users. I's crap but it has a fancy dress.

This two things are the most important for me. The rest can be improved but is not so important.
(edited)

Why would it take long? Even with modest trainers you can earn 100.000 euros and even millions for one trainingspot/season... It takes long if someone puts his money in his A-team and not in his trainers or trainees. The market is full of possibilities to play in 3-4 seasons with millions of euros. It's just a managerial choice.
(edited)

took you about 13 seasons to win the cup and be a steady team in our top division, without having had a single monster player in your starting team?
Obviously, few have the trading talent you have :)

waiting 2 or 3 years real time to have your team trained is just unrealistic...

I'm sure you don't mean it like you said it... ;)
I mean, in real life, have you ever seen a newly started team have its youth players fully trained and ready to beat the top teams of any country in just 3 years?
People keeps screaming for more realism. Well here you have it... training time and the time it takes to catch up. Probably one of the things in here that approaches realism the most :)

Number of games has no connection with the loss of users...

wrong, the two i recruited both complained about this.... But i agree that 3 matches a week will be too much at top level.... especially if CC is on top of it

To win the cup and be a respectable team in 2nd or 3rd division is still a big difference... With the number of users at the moment you can be with the 50 best teams within 5-6 sokkerseasons... But it's better for your team to grow slowly and to make your growth slower by investing always in your stadium, trainers, trainees instead of investing in short term older A-players.

WE DON'T NEED 1000 GAMES /WEEK ..GIVE UP THIS IDEA
(edited)

You are wrong, game rythmn is linked on how a player is involved/commited in the game. With so slow pace, it's easy to be bored and stop. Just considering that you need 2-3 years real life time to see a complete cycle for your team make people running far from this game.

People are leaving the game in high league also, I did, and many others did.

If people in higher leagues leave, then do they leave because of little number of games....? Suddenly after years of playig they have decided 'ooooh no...1 league game each week? screw it, I'm not playing anymore!'?

I doubt it :) It's not connected with the number of games but the quality of games - the way the engine works.

Sokker is becoming less and less atractive to new users because it has a totally archaic layout. Compare it to goal united, who started much later than sokker and as far as I remember reached 1 million users. Sokker never got to 70 thousand...

Another topic with this subject, why? There are already many :/

And ideas can be posted in Forum Bugs / Ideas (en), don't think this is the right forum.

Exactly :/

Another topic with this subject, why?

Maybe because some people are worried to notice that user number is decreasing every week since long and nothing change.
Where are the Dev ? Apparently they don't care that Sokker is dying fast. Maybe they are satisfied with the today income.

WE DON'T NEED 1000 GAMES /WEEK ..GIVE UP THIS IDEA

I already gave up the game, I can at least keep my idea.
(edited)

if you gave up the game ... why are you still bothering? :)

Decrease of managers, DEVs behaviour, Sokker is dying, etc etc etc .... all of this is also already in all the other topics that are made :/ So I really don't understand why this topic is different from all the other topics with the same subjects.

if you gave up the game ... why are you still bothering? :)

Because I love the tactic aspect, because I like the 2D viewer, because I like this kind of game, because I still hope the Dev could wake up etc...

Decrease of managers, DEVs behaviour, Sokker is dying, etc etc etc .... all of this is also already in all the other topics that are made :/ So I really don't understand why this topic is different from all the other topics with the same subjects.

There is nothing to understand, so don't waste to much time to think about it.
(edited)