Subject: game is dead ? what would you change

No progress since I left the game years ago. Something is going wrong around here.

Actually arcade games only expose how terrible this engine really is. I'm testing it now.

Progress in what?? changes, there have been quite some...... user numbers, no, but thats because we have to fight over new users with a lot of other games now...

Several things are bad here, who does not want to admit is folly. I remember the president of my country who think that denying these problems are to correct themselves.

People who think their opinion is the only right opinion are also folly :/ Besides, no game is perfect, all have good things and things that could be better. And those managers who are still playing Sokker know there are many good things, at least enough things to stay.

(edited)

If you really think that would have to take measures to strengthen the game and not just send a henchman to the forum to defend him.

Nonsense and bs, I've been send by no one. And if you think it's that bad, what are you still doing here?

Owner: Rippio
Joined: 2010-07-19

What a bad game Sokker is, right? So Bad that you play it for 3 years now ................

(edited)

I be able to play the game while there are other players. With the measures taken the last time are scaring players. I'm not the person to be retained, as you have noticed I keep playing but not all users are like me ... Think

If you want to discuss the things that could be better, you first have to read the posts of others. If you did that you would have known that I also have problems with the match delay ads and other things on Sokker like bad communication from the DEVs, the time it takes to fix bugs, etc.

And the staff is also discussing things on a forum which non-staff members can't read, and I can tell you that many don't agree with the DEVs about some (new) implementations. The staff aren't henchmen, enough of them do tell the DEVs clearly when they don't agree with implementations and/or (new) ideas.

And for me, when I read some good arguments on the forums which I can use to (hopefully) change the DEVs point of few, I will do that. But what you are doing is pointless. Only post complaints won't help and is totally useless.

stupid engine. Same everything as much as possible ant completely different results:

http://online.sokker.org/comment/matchID/23205607
http://online.sokker.org/comment/matchID/23205608

you still cant figurate out what are chances and probobilities? in RL and in sokker tackles can be won or lost, shots can found net or miss, dribbles can be success and failure. but U fail to comprehend. Football is not about staticstic neither sokker should be game like it. Most shots on goal doesnt win U match it only gives U more chances to score but not certain one. In Rl like in sokker with EVERY shot there is equal chance to score (50%- it is either goal or not :D) and acumulative number of shots doesnt give U more % to score, it is like flipping coin.

In Rl there was few weeks ago game in European league where Hajduk Slit played against Dila Gori and they shot 16 shots against Dila's 1... Dila won 1:0...Shoud Hajduk say that it is unrealistic and it leave football? There is a reason why RL basketball, handball is more "fair" that football...

but 4 goals in other way? isnt that a bit too much? if you would tell me there was 5% chance that 1st match will happen from all possibilities I would understand but now you told some bullshit. Know that my strikers have unearthly striker skill that means they are world class like suarez cavani ibrahimovic and all but not such shit like hajduk split lol

hajduk players can hardly hit the target from 20 metres
(edited)

Contrary to the popular beliefe of the sokker community Charles is is actually one of the biggest critiques of the DEVs on staff forum..He just comes across as a henchman because he is a sokker fanatic and he still believes it can be saved:-)

+1

In the match you lose you have two substitions of worse midfielders then those who played entire match you won.... which is a big factor for the number of shots produced for both sides..... which also is a factor of probability, meaning the number of shots can go up and down even if it had been exact same setups, lead by all those single events with probability that can go different ways within a match.... you cant say stupid engine because of two matches going either way...... you could say stupid engine because of better tactic, better team not winning majority of matches over a bigger number of matches (like 6 wins, 2 draws, 2 losses on 10 matches should be the outcome with better tactic and sligthly better players)....

And btw. unearthly strikers arent like suarez or cavani... triple superdivine is.... Unearthly strikers are like defoe, wellbeck, podolski and such if you want to compare.....

You are very wrong. I am a user without plus. The only active form that I have to help this game is expressed again and again the same: "Gentlemen, you are wrong" Proofread errors because the game is slowly dying. Someday someone will read ...