Subject: »Downtime

no man , stoichkov look to google

as i said i was not refreing you in my post
(edited)

ok

Ah, so others are the bad guys but you are just a Sokker player with Plus who happens to be in every topic when there a problems and fires that need to be started or heated even more .... mmm .... what a coincidence.

That is my right!
If someone is not doing his job, must be criticized.

As long as you understand others have that same right too.

EDIT: and just to remind you, some managers have posted options for managers, because only complaining in a topic won't change a damn thing. Did you post something managers can do to solve this problem?
(edited)

PUT to everyvody plus to thank them for abjection.Thank you

όποιος κατάλαβε κατάλαβε

1)remove the stupid auction fee so more people would use the asking price feature

This makes no sense to me. Managers want to be sure to sell a player for an X ammount, but this has to be free? This sounds like 'I want all the benefits, but I want it all for free'. That's not how things work in this world ;)

That's the reason that people don't use it OBVIOUSLY

I think the main reason is because it costs money and managers don't like that, they want all the profits they can get, and take the risk by not using a realistic auction fee.

plus.if i overestimate the asking price of a player and he doesn't get sold,i still have to pay the tax

And whose fault is this when this overestimation happens?

Also,teams that have a negative balance can't use it and they are exposed to shit like yesterday
What about them?

They are screwed. But have you ask yourself: didn't managers do this to themselves in the first place because of their negative balance? A negative balance doesn't happen out of the blue.


So no, I don't agree with your idea of removing the auction fee.

Admins have the right to cancel a transfer, you dont expect them to cancel all the transfers one-by-one. In this case, a rollback should've been done, only dev's can do that, no devs, case closed. It's sad, i know, but this is how sokker works in the past couple of years.

Guys, please, there's no need to argue this beyond the infinity. There's nothing we can do. Period.

My last post was an answer to the idea of deleting the auction fee, not about the downtime itself because indeed, only DEVs can do something, but no news till now so probably nothing will be undone/changed.

EDIT: and just to remind you, some managers have posted options for managers, because only complaining in a topic won't change a damn thing. Did you post something managers can do to solve this problem?


I'm not paid to think!
I paid to enjoy myself.

i like your video :)

no devs case closed .
this logic is wrong if have to admins should go to all transfer one by one and they should do it
there is not too much transfers for 2-3h gap but we have a lot of staff.
Yes for devs will 5-10 min to write simple sql query and do backup but something has to be done .
Otherwise it means the game is dead.

όποιος κατάλαβε κατάλαβε
what ?

Strange logic, but ok, that's fine with me.

this logic is wrong if have to admins should go to all transfer one by one and they should do it
there is not too much transfers for 2-3h gap

You gotta rollback all the transfers that happened in three hours on a Sunday evening. That's a lot. I've counted that 140 transfers will occur in the next 3 hours, and its Monday. I presume there was at least 3-400 transfers on Sunday night. Im not even sure if they can track down all the transfers that happened in a fixed period of time, dont know if they have acces to a transfer history or something like that. Anyways, for transfer cancellation, they need a strong motive, and that amount definitely needs the approval of a dev, i suppose.

we have a lot of staff

No, we dont. Most of them are veggies, no offense.

something has to be done

True

the game is dead

No, but with this kind of developer involvement, it will be, for sure.


We've seen this issue countless times now, in the past when dev's were active, at least we get a "sorry for inconvenience", that's the only difference. This current issue wont be solved, so its useless to debate it endlessly, imho.